"Hun antok at jeg ikke snakket norsk."

Translation: She assumed that I didn't speak Norwegian.

[A_Blaine]

en fatal feil

[jmharmon125]

so why is ikke before the verb on this one?

[Luke_5.1991]

It's a relative clause. They follow certain conjunctions like "at."

[ryannichols7]

hopefully I'll be able to say this one when I go to norway next year.

[danielportillo26]

Is it possible to use "antatt" instead antok in this or another sentences?

[Deliciae]

You could use "Hun har antatt at [...]" for "She has assumed that [...]", but of course changing the tense changes the meaning.

[danielportillo26]

Hmm, I guess the same principle goes for "forsto" and "forsått", is it more or less like in english "wrote" and "written"? thanks

[fehrerdef]

yes, antatt and forstått are participles, antok and forsto is past tense.

[JonnaNono]

Is it necessary to always use 'at' after 'antar', or can it be left out similarly like it often is?