The first time you worked this lesson the translations for the word "aspecto" were listed as 'aspect' and 'appearance'. So why wouldn't your answer be accepted???? I have found that the first time you translate a brand new sentence Duolingo ONLY goes for the first word in the group. In this case it would be aspect. Later, if you work the lessons a second, third, fourth time the secondary word is accepted. Why? Who knows. Maybe it was programmed that way.
How many centuries do we need???
"English usage since the 14th century has widely embraced the use of they with a singular antecedent, especially in cases where the identity is unknown or unspecified. Furthermore, its use has also been considered appropriate in formal and prestigious literary works." https://www.druide.com/en/reports/singular-they
"the use of plural pronouns to refer back to a singular noun isn’t a sign of declining standards in modern English: it represents a revival of a practice dating from the 16th century" https://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/06/he-or-she-versus-they/
"The use of singular they builds on centuries of usage, appearing in the work of writers such as Chaucer, Shakespeare, and Jane Austen. In 2015, singular they was embraced by the Washington Post style guide. Bill Walsh, copy editor for the Post, described it as 'the only sensible solution to English’s lack of a gender-neutral third-person singular personal pronoun.'" http://www.americandialect.org/2015-word-of-the-year-is-singular-they
"You" was once only a plural pronoun as well.
Yes. I do realize that. I am a native speaker. I was replying to a comment above where Brianmeagh1 was asking about using they about using they or their when referring to a person without their gender. It is common to see something like A person might not know their drivers license number and then they have to look at it. I was simply saying that although it was common to see they or their misused like this, it would not be correct.
"the language really needs to come up with a neuter personal pronoun"
Actually, in this case I believe it has. It is staring you in the face. The new genderless pronouns are spelled exactly like "their" and "they" and are used to denote genderless possession, as in, "A parent should love their child," and genderlessness in general, as in, "Someone has been smoking inside. Can't they read the no-smoking signs posted everywhere?" These are not examples of "they" and "their" being used incorrectly, these are examples of new words with new functions.
The Oxford English grammar guide and dictionary now recognize these uses as legitimate in everyday speech. This is a good example of how language evolves. Without such evolution and rule-breaking there would be no poetry in the world. Shakespeare constantly broke rules and the world is better for it.
"They" and "their" have actually been used as genderless singular pronouns for centuries. See my references above.
The mess actually came in the 18th and 19th century when, suddenly, people came to fear the genderless third person singular pronoun. We are now fixing their mistake.
You are right that it is weird, but "I like your aspect." is correct translation according to Duolingo so there is no reason whatsoever why "I liked their aspect" should be wrong. And for example "He was a most willing horse, and I liked his aspect of solid, pertinacious English flesh." is perfect English sentence. ;-)
You are absolutely correct that aspect is a possible translation for aspecto in this sentence. But, although I encourage the use of cognates to quickly build your Spanish vocabulary, it is important to understand when the Spanish or the English definitions contain uses not found in the other language. Until your Spanish language abilities have rooted themselves so that you are actually thinking on Spanish, you will always tend to think aspect first when you hear aspecto. The problem comes in when that is not the most common usage of the Spanish word aspecto. The most common usage is look or appearance. There are some pretty perfect cognates between Spanish and English as well as those that are completely false friends like embarazada and actualmente. But it is the ones that share one or more, but not all definitions with English that you have to be most careful with. Your English brain will automatically hear the cognate. You just have to remember when to check other definitions.
Maybe it works for Duolingo, but not for this native speaker. You wouldn't "like" someone's or something's aspect. You might like their viewpoint, vantage point, or appearance, but not their aspect.
There is a sense of this in reviewing the definitions of aspect, e.g. https://www.wordnik.com/words/aspect and considering how "liking" most of these seems clunky. But ultimately you'll just have to take a native speaker's word for it.
For example: "He was a most willing horse, and I liked his aspect of solid, pertinacious English flesh." Or: "Who knows? It may be so… I am happy about what Godard said, I liked his aspect." Or: "I needed somebody and I talked to him and I liked his aspect over the phone." etc...
Well... It depends what you mean by "look." "Mirada" means "look" in the sense of glance, gaze, or expression. So, if that is what you liked, yes, I guess you could say: "Me gustó su mirada." "Aspecto" means "look" in the sense of appearance. That is the kind of "look" that Duo's sentence is referring to.
I have found it worthwhile, although very time-consuming, to look up new words (and even old ones) in a source other than Duolingo and to try to ferret out all their meanings, uses, and subtleties - their essence. However, this is the umpteenth Spanish course that I have taken. I don't recommend this kind of research if this is the first time you are taking Spanish. You will probably find it bewildering and, ultimately, discouraging. Stick with the basic, common meanings and come to the discussion for clarification. You can gradually add other meanings to your knowledge as you go along. ¡Buena suerte en su búsqueda de español!
When working with the verb "gustar," it really helps me to think of it as something "pleasing" TO me instead of my directly "liking" something. So I'd translate this as "Her look pleased me" or "Her look was pleasing to me." To me it explains why the gustar conjugation relates to "her aspect" instead of me.
Yes DL rejects this and I'm not sure why.
The only reason that people translate gustar as "is pleasing to" is because it is the solution for the subject/ object issue. But Spanish does have a verb "to please". Because both Spanish speakers and English speakers would not find to be pleasing to and to like to be the same, if only because people express liking in a set way, the really deserve different translations. Gustar is used exactly like the verb to like in terms of when and how it is used. This makes it the best translation. This is just like saying that the best translation for Buenos Días is Good Morning instead of Good Day. This is the equivalent expression.
That would be a different sentence. Me gustó su aspecto means I liked her appearance/look. This is how she looked TO me. If you say say me gustó su miraba, you would be saying you like her glance/look. This would be talking about how she looked AT me. This sentence would probably only be interpreted that way in the.proper context. I liked the look she gave me when she opened my present. Unfortunately this may be one of those lose/lose scenarios for Duo. If they don"t accept that translation, they aren't accepting all possibilities, but if they accept that translation (which means it might be presented as a correction to an incorrect answer), we would have dozens of complaints that nobody would say that. In this case, however, I.don't think the ambiguity even occurred to them without the context.
Gustó is the third person preterite, so it is liked. Remember that gustar is "backwards" compared to the English verb like. When you say I like something, gustar makes the thing you like the subject of the sentence and the subject of the English sentence is shown in the indirect object pronoun me. So the present tense of this sentence is me gusta su aspecto. The first person present gusto is only used when someone likes YOU. Te gusto (you like me). This is why you will see so many people falsely translate gustar as being pleasing to someone. It is false because like is actually the best translation, but It is pleasing to me does reflect the correct subject and object of the Spanish sentence.
Yes. The most common use of the Spanish word aspecto is for appearance or look. It also does have the meaning of the cognate aspect, but that doesn't make sense here. An aspect is like a facet. The idea is that everyone and everything has several or many aspects. So you wouldn't say I like his aspect, you would say I like that aspect of him or I like it from that aspect. The latter uses aspect almost like point of view, which is what I believe relates that meaning of aspecto to appearance.