Actually the second article is not needed in English, e.g. He has a cup and saucer; where the items are not related both articles would be more usual, e.g. He has a book and a laptop.
Yes, in English we would say ".......a first name and a last name" or "..........a given name and a surname" or even "...........a forename and a surname" but we would never say ".........a name and a surname". I just put that because I knew it was the sort of answer Duo was expecting. Of course native English speakers know this but I thought it worth mentioning in case others thought "name" meant "first name". NB we all used to refer to our first names as Christian names in Australia even if we weren't Christians but you cannot do that these days as it is not PC.
It's better to say "He has a given name and a sur- ( or family, clan or similar) name as this removes at least some of the cultural bias. In some systems (e.g. Chinese) the family name comes first, so the given name is not the first name. In other systems their may not be a family name. There are many, many different naming systems.
Agreed. As far as I am concerned, "Name" includes "surname" - which I think equates to "family name", which is less culturally specific. As is "given name", which can be applied in most cultures. "First name" is no good because the given name doesn't always come first. A billion plus Chinese can't be wrong!
And then there are the complications of (Russian) patronymics and (Spanish) matronymics. My knowledge runs out here ...
You cannot say this in English. You would have to say "forename and surname", or a "Christian name and surname". You could replace 'forename' with 'first name', or 'surname' with 'family name'. 'and' in English must link words with exclusive domains, such as 'fish and chips' (fish are not chips and vice versa). You cannot have overlapping domains, such as 'bears and animals', even though 'bear' is an element in the set of 'animal' objects. In the previous example, 'chip' was not an element in the set of 'fish' objects. The given answer is therefore wrong, as somebody's name would include their surname.
why is surname not allowed for nome in this question, but is ok in others?