"Han elsker kona si."
Translation:He loves his wife.
22 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
1707
I'm trying to nail down this rule... but struggling. So could you say either "kona si" or "hans kona"? Would both be accurate, but the former just emphasizes a bit more precisely whose wife it is that he's loving?
"Si/sin/sitt" points back to the subject of the sentence, in this case making it clear that the subject ("han") loves his own wife. Using "hans" would imply that he loves somebody else's wife.
The English "his" is ambiguous, so when translating from English to Norwegian we often have to allow for both options.
- 111
I think you're referring to 'kona si' vs 'si kona'. Both would be referring to this guy's own wife but it's essentially saying "his wife" vs "HIS wife".
Si/sitt/sin is when the thing owned is owned by tge subject of the sentence. 'Han elsker kvinnen sin' = he loves his (own) woman, whereas 'Han elsker kvinnen hans' could = he (justin) loves his (brad's) woman, where both 'he's in the sentence are not referring to the same person.
I thought si is feminine, if she is "his wife" it supposed to be "kona sin" am I wrong?
The possessive agrees with the possessed (kona), not the possessor (han).
Couldn't it be sin anyway since you can use masculine? sin is (m/f)? Am I wrong?
If you opt to use the masculine declination "konen", you can use sin, but when the feminine form "kona" is used, you have to follow suit.
Hi all! didn´t get this, the tips mention sin si sitt sine as used with objects only and not somebody but is used for wife and husband?
It is the grammatical object, not object as in "a thing". In this sentence "Han" is the subject, "elsker" is the verm and "kona si" is the (direct) object.
It's not uncommon for a word to have several meanings, neither in English nor Norwegian.
"Si" as an imperative verb means "say". You can read up on "si" as a possessive in the posts above.
You could but that would denote someone else's wife, not his own. You use 'si' when referring back to the grammatical subject of the sentence, a distinction we don't have in English grammar.
