1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: Russian
  4. >
  5. "В этом парке есть всё."

"В этом парке есть всё."

Translation:This park has everything.

November 4, 2015



Why in this phrase, there isn't "У" before it, Because that I know, the verb "есть" without this letter "У", this verb turns "to eat". Someone help me!!

  • есть = to eat (infinitive)
  • есть = am/is/are ("to be" in present tense, but in Russian it is only used in some cases)

These words are homonymic. In this case, "есть" means "is", sort of "In this park is everything".


Like "En este parque está todo" in Spanish?


Yes, but I'm not 100% sure about the correctness of the Spanish phrase.


I would say: "Este parque tiene todo" or "Hay de todo en este parque".


For your first example, it's better to say "Este parque lo tiene todo" or "Este parque tiene de todo". Otherwise it sounds incomplete: "Este parque tiene todo.... lo que un parque debería tener" or "Este parque tiene todo... lo que necesito para hacer deporte". For example.

The second phrase is perfect :)


It is correct, I can assure it :) (it's my native language)


Great then! This is a cool example when word-by-word translation works perfectly.


It is mine as well, and the sentence does sound strange to me too. I would perhaps use as above "en este parque hay de todo" or "este parque tiene de todo". Where abouts do you live? Do you speak mainland spain Spanish, or from some region of south America? Perhaps it is a regional thing. I just wanted to point it out for those looking to learn Spanish, even though were in a russian comment section!


What about "hay todo"?


This phrase is correct but "En este parque hay de todo" is more natural


o tambien <<este parque lo tiene todo>>


Dans ce parc, il y a tout. In this park, there is everything.


Yes, like" En este parque hay todo" I speak spanish and learning Russian :)


Yes, I translated it like this. :)


'En este parque hay de todo: y creo también puede ser correcto 'este parque tiene todo'


No. En este parque HAY todo. Есть en este caso significa "hay". Que bien podrías pensarlo como ESTÁ todo, pero no nunca diríamos asi nosotros. There is everything in this park.


When a russian discussion become spanish :)


En este parque hay todo suena extremadamente raro en español, al menos en España. Yo diría En este parque hay de todo, Este parque tiene de todo o Este parque lo tiene todo.


Sí, concuerdo, pero por lo menos en Latinoamérica también se puede decir like." En este parque hay todo". Suena bien aquí aunque se dice más frecuentemente como dices"En este parque hay de todo". :)


En este parque hay de todo.


O "este parque tiene todo" así lo entendí yo


জয় বাংলা


So, this phrase above is wrong, of duolingo?


Which phrase? This park has everything? It is another way to say "There is everything in this park" or "In this park, there is everything" in English. Nothing wrong about it.


I wrote " in this park is everything" and it is refused. Do I report it ? Thanks for your answer.


probably because it is wrong in English to say 'in the park is everything'. We say 'the park has everything' or, 'in the park there is everything'


Ya so shouldn't it be fine if you don't use в


Me too broo like whatt


Can you always omit the "y"?


We don't omit the "у" here, it's a totally different construction. В этом парке, not у этого парка.


"В этом * есть..." = "IN this * there is...", it is about the existence of something, like in "in this bag there are some money, lipstick and a gun" = "в этой сумке есть немного денег, помада и пистолет". And as of "У этого * ЕСТЬ..." = "This * HAS...", it is about possession of some attribute or property, like in "this bag HAS a snap strap" = "У этой сумки ЕСТЬ отстегивающийся ремешок"


Is there another way to say it that would be more natural?


Nope. If you are amazed with the number and variety of all these different things, places and activities in the park, then that's exactly the phrase you'll tell your friend in Russian.


Duolingo has been very nitpicky in other lessons about semantics, it's odd that here it's much less so.


Russians do not use "У" construction for objects. For objects they use a construction using "В" + prepositive case, instead of "У" + genitive case!


That's not accurate. An object as well as a person can posses a property or an attribute: "This book has an ISBN" = "У этой книги есть ISBN", "This girl has a name" = "У этой девочки есть имя"; "This bag has a snap strap" = "У этой сумки есть отстёгивающийся ремешок", "This professor has a stupid tie" = "У этого профессора дурацкий галстук"; "This park has a long history" = "У этого парка большая история", "These young men have a bright future" = "У этих молодых людей светлое будущее". And "В" also can be used talking about something both a person or an object consist of, lack, contain or posses: "There are so much fear and loathing in Los Angeles" = "В Лос Анжелесе так много страха и ненависти", "There is a number of beautiful traits come together in that woman" = "В этой женщине сошлось множество прекрасных черт характера", "There is a terrible stench in this hole" = "В этой дыре ужасная вонь", "There is something odd in that clown" = "В этом клоуне есть что-то подозрительное". Sorry for inconsistency, but the idea is there))


Thanks. That is the answer I was looking for.


Makes sense really. People can own things (genitive) but objects like parks have them only in the sense that something exists there.


"В" = in

"У" = by

The Russian is literally saying "In this park exists everything."

"У тебя есть кошкa" literally translates as "By you (there) is (a) cat."

Russian seems to have a predilection for starting sentences with prepositional phrases.


Ест=еat, as in "Он ест" (He eats). Есть=there is, as in "У меня есть кошка" (with me there is a cat/I have a cat)


I simplify "my learning curve" my asking myself what is the overall lesson being taught here? It's about the lesson "WHERE", so the leading factor is probably going to that point as the lesson which in the "TIPS" pointed out HA and B were what is being pointed out so I gathered that "B was an important to card to play in this round of Russian poker and the only proper fit was where the "Y" would usually go in conjunction with ectb. I hope I made that easier and not more confusing...the ingots will tell me.


This is the first time coming across этом for me. I googled and found it is a prepositional case. Aren't the majority of forms of это prepositional? I can't understand when this form is to be used instead of one of the other это forms. Can someone please explain?


I don't want to discourage you, but take a look at what you'll have to memorize:

<pre> Masculine - Feminine - Neutral - Plural </pre>

Nominative - э'тот - э'та - э'то - э'ти

Genitive - э'того - э'той - э'того - э'тих

Dative - э'тому - э'той - э'тому - э'тим

Accus inan - э'тот - э'ту - э'то - э'ти -

Accus anim - э'того - э'ту - э'то - э'тих

Instrumental - э'тим - э'той, э'тою - э'тим - э'тими

Locative - э'том - э'той - э'том - э'тих

Source: http://starling.rinet.ru/cgi-bin/morphque.cgi?flags=endnnnnp


If you didnt want to discourage us... you failed


Am I the only one who is actually encouraged because of the love of learning hard but beautiful languages ?


I had mixed emotions about this: 1. You don't even want to know what I thought when i saw this.
2. Then I was very grateful to you for the information.
3. Lastly, I realized this will be introduced a little at a time.
Conclusion: I will survive.
Thanks again for the information.


beugh, I dont think I could remember that's all


link no longer exists


if there is a pronounciation of these I would give a lingot.


Wow, how confusing it is. :/


Wow, how confusing it is :/


The preposition 'В', 'in', is followed by the prepositional case I believe. You have to memorize which cases go with which prepositions.


Thank you. So are there other cases used for other prepositions, like on, under, around, etc.? is этом only used with В?


There are a handful of prepositions that actually use the prepositional case: при, по, в, о, and на are the only ones I can think of. All of those would use этом. In typical Russian irony, most Russian prepositions are actually followed by the genitive case (such as у, mentioned above) (which in the example of это, is этого). And of course some use dative, instrumental, accusative and even nominative. Русский Язык, Ура!


When I did Russian at school, you had to learn the preposition + X (X being whichever case that preposition takes) e.g. из + Genitive out of. Take a look at http://www.study-languages-online.com/grammar/tables/prepositions-cases


I wonder, where is this park that Duolingo keeps raving about?


Maybe it was inside of us all along.


'There's all in the park' is another sentence that should be removed.


You could make it work if you said it in a really creepy voice like ; Theres all... in the park... ;)


"In this park is everything." not accepted? Why?


"In this park there is everything" would be better English.


Or 'This park has everything'


would be better English*)


No, you would not say this in English


I totally agree. Presumably one doing this course already has mastery over english and doesnt need yo be corrected. The course needs to allow for hyper literal translations. It helps us to think in Russian and apply the language patterns to other scenarios e.g. Understanding that Меня зовут Лео = "Me (they) call Leo".. not actually "My name is Leo" helps to learn exactly what you're saying and remember the phrase.


Because in English, the subject almost without exception comes before the verb. Placing the subject after the verb is very unusual and highly stylized, used only as a kind of emphasis on being weird - like Yoda in the Star Wars movies. Otherwise, it is bad English to put the subject after the verb, as you have done here.

Note: There's an old American song from the 1940-1950's titled "Throw Mama From the Train (a kiss)". It's a reference to recent immigrants or to an immigrant culture here which had not quite caught up with speaking American English.


"There is everything in this park" is accepted, and is pretty much what you wrote.


what is the rule of this construction? why does it start with в and not у?


У is usually used to express possession (mostly refering to people) and Β expresses existance in place


It is not about possession, it's about existence.


Why do we use "В" for парке when it's an open space?


I'm not a native Russian speaker but I assume just like in Arabic, French, and English. propositions are used with certain words just because... even if it doesn't make perfect sense .. get ON the plane ( when actually you get IN it just like you 'get IN car' )


This is not a strict rule.



Whether or not a park is an open space depends on what you mean by open and what you mean by space.


В этом предложении неправильная интонация. Вместо утвердительной звучит вопросительная интонация.


What's the difference between 'ест' and 'есть'? What does the 'ь' add/change?


The ь is the soft sign, meaning that the T is soft. Russian actually has two sets of consonants with the same characters. When you put the soft sign (or a soft vowel) after a hard consonant, you change the sound of it slightly, making it palatalized. It is hard for me to hear.

In the written form it's helpful because, ест is "eat" and есть is "has". (I believe есть is also the infinitive 'to eat' but let's just skip that part for now).


What's the difference between етом and ета? Are they just variations on what is essentially the same thing, like this and that, or is one of them gendered, or what?


Yes, этот is the masculine version of the adjective "this" in the nominative case. эта is feminine, это is neuter and эти is plural. They change in different cases.


Ive noticed that Russian in translated into English in either a very poetic way, or a very simple straight forward, informal way. I read this as the poetic way which makes it easier. "In the park, is everything."


Can we use "всё есть v этом парке" instead of "этом парке есть всё" ?


It is grammatically correct, but somewhat poetic. Even though you can use it by itself, more often you'll find it in a bigger sentence with enumeration or in a similar context. E.g.: "Всё есть в этом парке: и качели, и кафе, и даже пруд с утками.", "Хочешь прогуляться по тенистой аллее, послушать пение птиц, вдохнуть свежий воздух? Всё [это] есть в этом парке."; note, that in the last case it can have a bit different meaning.


Formally, Russian language have almost free words order. "В этом парке есть всё", "Всё есть в этом парке", "Есть всё в парке этом", "В парке этом есть всё" - all of this are grammatically correct. Practically, words order is from already known to previously unknown. If previouse sentences were about the park - you'd better start with "В этом парке....", if previouse sentences were about trees or animals, or attractions you'd better start with "Всё есть". And yes, such games are often used in poetry, so unusual words order sounds poetically and/or (as Yoda speech in Russian translation) profound, as of you try to say something special about matter of the sentence.


What is the sound I hear between этом and парке (in the slow version)? It sounds to me like another в, but why?


i have made a mistake during typing. V - it is russian "B"


What's the difference between "эта/this" and "этом/this"?


I don't really understand the meaning of "этом", is it like этот эта это эти ?

thank you !


этом is the word 'this' when used as a demonstrative adjective in the prepositional case.

So in Russian it is used with prepositions like in, on, at etc. and in sentences like this one: 'In this park'. Just as 'park' has to be written in the prepositional case (парке) so do any adjectives used with it.

I think that этом is masculine and neutral, этой is feminine and этих is plural

You can see a table of all the forms of это here: http://masterrussian.com/aa112800a.shtml


Ha yes those different case.. thank you very much for you answer !


very welcome - learning Russian is a b***h


What's the difference between это, этом and этот


Man some ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ really likes to downvote comments


Why does it has В at the beginning? the translation is This park has everything!, so it gotta be Этом only, and btw why did we add M at the ending? as well as the B at the first of the sentence


When I speak, and I have to use "в" in a sentence, Do I have to stress it? Does it make a difference if it is in front of a phrase, or in the middle of a phrase? Because sometimes when I hear how it is said (by clicking the blue speaker icon), I don't even hear the computer say it.


The next word starts with vowel, so 'в' sounds softer and connects to that word. Don't try to emphasize it.

When there is a consonant after 'в', you hear it more clearly.


списиба! (hope I spelled this correctly)


Almost - Спасибо


"у" means at or near. So when you say "у меня есть книга" you are literally saying "at/near me is a book". This is why you do not use "у" in this case as you must use "в" with Park and "у" with a person.

so "В этом парке есть всё." literally translated to "in this park is everything."

Remember that "есть" with just means "is" is usually dropped, but when talking about possession in this case we use it.


If you read the discussion, you propably saw olimo's comment: "We don't omit the "у" here, it's a totally different construction. В этом парке, not у этого парка."

The confusion many seem to have with this sentence is due to the fact that English allowes you to use the verb have with both places and people, but when talking about places, you are not really talking about possession, it's more about excistence. See my comment above.

Finnish has the same construction, and it is believed that it was borrowed into Russian from Finno-Ugric languages. In Finnish at least it's possible to use a construction that looks like possessive construction of places, but it doesn't have the possessive meaning, it becomes a statement on existence (for some places) or very abstract statement about things like value or meaning. Actually these constructions look identical in every way, but they have different names and meanings (based on the subject and the complement). In Russian the Finnish constructions don't look identical, because of the prepositions. у requires genitive while в requires prepositional. I wish olimo would have given a translation for у этого парка. It would have been interesting to see if it's abstract like it would be in Finnish.


ja, I got it now, for place and people both have a different construction. When place is about excistence, people is more about possessive. Truely it is, people is a possessive being. Sometimes I'm sick of these people


Why the word " Пагк" changes by Парке?


It's the prepositional case, which is used after some prepositions, for example в.


What does it mean litterally?!


Literally: In this park is everything


To help think of it this way: have can be "i have problems" but it can also be " i am having eggs for breakfast" the same is for есть.


I find that sometimes, they expect it to be the way russian language is spoken. Although in english we say"This park has everything" instead of ïn this park is everything" where the sentence is not structured correctly but people still understand.


So I said, "This park has everything in it." because I figured that the letter "в" would mean that the word "in" would have to be used? Idk guess not.


Would it be correct to say it without "B" just "этом парке есть всё" ?


No, in russian you say "есть" ("is") instead of "имеет" ("has") talking about possessions, so you have to say where it is too - in this case "in the park" ("в парке"). Literal translation of "В этом парке есть все" is "There is everything in this park".


"En este parque esta todo" is grammatically correct but it is less common to say like that.


How does ето vs етом work?


I've seen this sentence so many times it is practically a meme


What is этом and how to use it? We have never encountered that word in the course


Take a look at this link. I hope it helps you. http://masterrussian.com/aa112800a.shtml


Why is there a B in the beginning? Also, wouldn't that translate to.. in the park has everything?


I have the same question, wonder if этом парке есть всё would be wrong


Would the literal translation be "in this park there is everything?"


Is this Russian sarcasm?


Do we need to have the B at the start of this sentence because we are saying this park has everything in it? When I look at the sentence in russian I thought the answer would just be "этом парке есть всё". Thanks.


Is the есть optional here? I am often uncertain about when it is necessary.


Could somone please explain all kinds of это, этот, эта... And where to use them?


Correct me if I am wrong please, but I feel the best English translation is "There is everything in this park".


As a literal breakdown, the Russian translates as

"In this park (V etom parke), exists (yest) everything (vsyo)." (Sorry for the lack of cryllic; computer doesn't have that yet).

Your translation works, but, personally, either seem acceptable.


If you are talking about a pc type computer, it does have it. It takes a couple of minutes to activate it. Less if you are familiar with the process. Search Duo for the few steps involved in installing it and how to easily toggle back and forth between Cyrillic and any other keyboard type you want to have available.

Once you can map your keyboard to Cyrillic on demand, it takes a couple of weeks at fifteen minutes a day to reach a skill level sufficient to comfortably work with Duo. (assuming you can already touch type)


A bit challenging to understand haha


When we use "это" and "этом", also "парк" & "парке"?


why "в" if the sentence begin with "this"?


Shouldn't it be, "IN this park has everything"?

Or can we still say, "Этом парке есть всё".


Why this park got it all wrong


The park has every thing.

The park did not get everything from someone or something. (at least not in the sentence you were given to translate)

I have ten fingers.

I did not get ten fingers.


This park got it all


Why "in this park" gone wrong?


the literal translation is "in this park has everything" how am i supposed to learn the speech pattern


Can someone please tell me why "in this park there's everything" is wrong? Granted it's not a pretty sentence but I thought it was correct.


Why is it "ETOM" instead of "ETOT"?


Why is "в" used in the starting


Did you hearded in slow mode this? The В is glitched (it says V- Etãm parke iest sio)


why "There are everything in this park." isn't accepted?


The English in your sentence is a little off. 'Everything' is a singular noun and thus requires the conjugation 'is' rather than 'are'.


How to use етом?


What is the difference between Это , этот, этом?


Это can mean 'it' (Это стол - It's a table), also it could be a demosntrative pronoun 'this' for nouns in neuter gender (Это имя мне незнакомо - I don't know this name). Этот is a demonstrative pronoun ('this') for masculine gender nouns (Этот компьютер слишком старый - This computer is too old). Этом is a demonstrative pronoun ('this') in prepositional (aka locative) case for masculine and neuter nouns (Я живу в этом доме - I live in this house). Keep in mind that - just like adjectives - demonstrative pronouns conjugate according to gender, case, and number, having about 20 forms each.


Why not. " этот парк есть всё. "


What you wrote is "this park is everything", as if it was the whole world. Both in Russian and in English "парк"/"park" is a subject in your sentence and "есть"/"is" is a predicate. "В этом парке есть все" translates as "this park has everything", and there is this "есть" versus "have" difference between russian and english languages, you could have already notice in previous lessons. In these sentences subjects are "все"("everything") in Russian, but still "park" in English, and predicates are "есть"("is") in Russian and "has" in English. Literal translation of "this park has everything" is "этот парк имеет все", "имеет" and not "есть". And there is no way an object(park) can posses(have) something material in Russian, that's why you have to say that something(everything) exists(is) in the object(park). I hope this mess I call a comment can be helpful)


And i cant understand why Duolingo always uses words that haven't been taught yet. Or they use examples and sentences that have nothing to do with the title of the lesson. Very often they give an accusative sentence in the Genitive lesson. Or a sentence in singular at the plural lesson. It's non sense for me


Hard to see how anyone can learn a foreign language without being exposed to words that they haven't seen before.

Seems to me, throwing in something from outside the subject of the lesson is a good way to test if a student really understands the lesson.


So, I can understand the meaning of в only basing on the sense of the sentence? 'Cause в has 3 meanings (in, at, this)


Is it этом because we're talking about being AT a location? I think that's right but someone plz confirm?


What's the difference between Это , эта , этот , этом?


This park has everything. Trees, benches, Dan Cortese


How to sue етом?


Incredible how sometimes Russian resembles Portuguese...

In spoken Portuguese, the word order could be pretty much the same

"Neste parque tem tudo"


Neste = In this Parque = park Tem = have Tudo = everything


What is the в before the парке refer to? What is it's purpose?


In this park has everything//En este parque hay de todo


in this park is everything - in my opinion also should work


Is it ok to say "Зто парке есть всё". If not what does в insinuate. Спасибо in advance.


The woman made it sound like a question. Maybe the intonation should be fixed.


What does "этом" mean ?


At this park there is everything


The B does not sound at all in the sentence. Sentence sounds like it begins with etom not B


why does vse sound like it has an o at the end


Because it is not "vse" ("все"-"everyone", "every"), but "vso" ("всё" - "everything", "all").


Correct solution: "In that park there is it all."?! This doesn't sound like natural English to me...


What's the difference between в and этом? Can you use one without the other?


Why not just Эта парке есть всё?


Why is B there instead of у


Can you use "eta" and the first 2 words of that sentence interchangeably?


I guess Leslie Knope works at Duolingo now


what is the difference between Эта и Этом?


Google translate says it means "there is everything in this park"


Could someone please explain to me these new variations "этом, этого"? P.S, please don't just send me a link.


In this park there is everything

There's everything in this park


Shouldn't this be: "In this park, there is everything"?


why not just "этом парке есть всё"?


No matter how many times I listen to the audio I still cant pronounce this


I'm sure it makes sense grammatically but this can't be how a russian would actually phrase it


Why " В " is there ?


It is the russian proposition "in." The sentence literally translates as:

"In this park[, there] is everything." Russian seems to like putting places at hte start of the sentence like that.


This has been answered in previous comments. It means "In"


What does the В accomplish?


Incredible how sometimes Russian resembles Portuguese...

In spoken Portuguese, the word order could be pretty much the same

"Neste parque tem tudo"


Neste = In this Parque = park Tem = have Tudo = everything


I typed "v etom parke est vse", and it was marked as wrong.

This course has been on for more than one year already, yet there is some lack of consistency when correcting transliteration that never seems to be fixed.

It is kind of annoying for those who use computers where they are not allowed to install new input methods.

Learn Russian in just 5 minutes a day. For free.