1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: Russian
  4. >
  5. "Here are the tables."

"Here are the tables."

Translation:Вот столы.

November 8, 2015



My Russian girlfriend says that without additional context, knowing whether it should be вот or здесь is impossible. Can we change this to accept both already? Not to mention it's kinda rare to say "Here you go, some tables." It seems much more likely to be in a situation when someone is looking for them and you want to show them where you are.


Seconded... Same situation (hopefully not same gf), but my gf said the same... Not to mention i got it "wrong", that's why i went to the discussion in the first place...


I think "Здесь столы" would mean "There are tables here".


why вот and not здесь?

  • 2103

Formally you are right - both can be translations of "here", but in practice they have slightly different meanings. "Вот" is used to demonstrate that something is here. "Здесь" is used to demonstrate that something is here. These are subtleties though - you will be understood either way.


Yes, it is a good explanation, but I hold that without more context, either should be accepted. Here are the TABLES or HERE are the tables... how do we know?


Its just like english in a way. "I saw a man on a hill with a telescope" can be interpreted in multiple ways, five different ways actually. Or, we saw her duck. You could mean you saw a duck that belonged to her, you saw her bend quickly to avoid something or you use a saw to cut her duck.


Are these the ways?

  1. I am on hill, i (visually) saw a man, the man possessed a telescope (grammatically awkward). From a hill, i visually saw a man who possessed a telescope.

  2. I am on hill, i used a telescope to see a man. This occurred in past. Using a telescope on a hill, I visually saw a man.

  3. I visually saw a man who was located on a hill, and i used a telescope to see him. Using a telescope, i visually saw a man who was located on a hill.

  4. (Ridiculous, silly interpretations 4 to 7)... I cut a man who is located on a hill, and i use a telescope like a saw (tool) to cut him. Generally speaking, I am a person who cuts (uses a saw tool)...who or what do i cut? A man. Where do i cut? On a hill. What do i use to cut? A telescope.

  5. Generally speaking, I am a person who cuts (uses a saw tool)...who or what do i cut? A man located on a hill. What do i use to cut? A telescope.

  6. Generally speaking, I am a person who cuts (uses a saw tool)...who or what do i cut? A man who possesses a telescope. The man is located on a hill.

  7. Generally speaking, I am a person who cuts (uses a saw tool)...who or what do i cut? A man. Where do i cut a man? On a hill, a hill where a telescope is located.

  8. I visually saw a man who was located on a particular hill, the hill that possessed or “on which was located” a telescope. I visually saw a man who was located on a hill and a telescope was located on that hill as well.


Ого, я никогда даже не задумывался об этом. Интересно, а как можно объяснить варианты "вот здесь столы" или "а здесь вот столы", которые тоже являются корректными и употребимыми?


very good explanation - thank you!


"Вот" is like pointing to something.


they gave эта in the hint


I think здесь столы should be an accepted answer. Am I wrong in thinking this?


What's difference between столы, столе and стола?


Стола и столе are different declensions of the same word - стол - and are used in accordance with different cases and contexts. Столы is the plural of стол.

Это стол. - It is a table. (Nominative) Яблоко на столе. - The apple is ON the table. (Prepositional) У меня нет стола. - I don't have a table. (Genitive)

You will learn more about when to apply these cases and how to use them as you learn the langauge further!


I just read your explanation. Can you please tell more about how many cases is in russian grammar and which are they? Thank you and I wish you good day.


6: — nominative — accusative — dative — genetive — instrumental — prepositional


What is the difference between столи and столы


In principle, plurals are formed by adding -ы to the end of the word, if the word is masculine (стол -> столы), changing the -а into -ы if the word is feminine (мама -> мамы), or changing the -о of neutri into -а.

Then, there are some exceptions when the plural -ы is changed into -и, such as after certain consonants (к, г, х, ш, щ, ч, ж), or when the feminine word ends with -я instead of -а. Also, -и is used in plurals always when the singular form ends with -ь.

Plurals of neutri ending with -е are formed with -я.

  • 2103

"Столи" is not a word while "столы" is a plural form of "стол".


"Столы вот" is not accepted. Why is the order critical here? Thanks!


This form is well, but it's very rare used in Russian. For example: "A: Где они? B: Столы? Вот." (A: Where are they? B: Do you mean tables? They are here.


здесь есть столы = here there are tables столы здесь = tables are here


Why "вот есть столы" is wrong?


We don't normally use the verb "to be" in the present tense, unless it is a phrase like "у меня есть". "Есть" is never used with "вот", at least I can't think of such a sentence.


Вот та столы


Та is feminine so isn't even grammatical here. Вот те столы is grammatical, but it means something like "here are those tables".


Непонятно вот столы и здесь столы. На английском вроде одинаково, но когда какой вариант употребить? Есть ли правило?


вот стол = here is the table столе здесь = the table is here Does not make sense at all lmao

Learn Russian in just 5 minutes a day. For free.