Translation:She does not eat the ingredient on the plate.
I said "she doesn't eat the ingredients on the plate" as that would be correct english, but it says I was wrong for using plural...
...and me! I agree that this 'foolishness' helps basic grammar, but when it doesn't make common sense - sense then we have a problem..!
if I see "l'ingrediente", should this be the feminine plural? How do I know if it is the irregular singular with "e" or the regular "e" feminine plural?
the article is a tip-off. l' is only used for singular nouns. if it were feminine and plural, the article would be le.
It is a well-established principle of language learning to practice things one really might say. Do you "practice" golf by hitting basketballs with sledgehammers? No, you hit golf balls with golf clubs.
If you're looking for a 'well-established" approach to lamguage learning - sign up for a class or something.. i love the way duolingo builds up the knwledge from previous lessons. We are looking at a grammatical structure and it is shown in a brilliant way. Think alittle before hating next time
Riiiight: anyone who points out an error in DuoLingo's approach is "hating": they are immune from all criticism, I suppose?
It actually is a well-established principle of language learning to start with sentences that help you practice the grammatical structure of the lesson. It doesn't matter if it says all elephants are polka-dotted as long as it helps to understand the grammar. Anyone who has a problem with Duolingo should go to "Report a Problem" or "Support", not clutter up the discussion page.
So? Language practice should be based on sensible sentences one might actually use!
I recommend that anyone who does not like a sentence -- just skip it and go on to the next one. Why worry about it? It is a free program. Use the parts you like and skip the rest.
I almost pressed "According to the boy, she does not eat tomato." instead. That was close.
What is the difference between is not eating and does not eat? It is the present tense. I am eating = I eat. I am not eating = I do not eat. No?
"I eat" can mean that you usually eat for example meat. But "I am eating" means you are eating just now your meal.
For example you could say "I am not eating that!" meaning you don't want to eat the food that has been offered. Or "I do not eat meat" would mean that you are vegetarian and don't ever eat meat.
i typed "i do not eat..." (pathetic, i know :P) but the issue is: the correction suggests "she does not eat..." and "YOU do not eat..." but "lei" is absolutely not translated as "you", right?
Lei is definitely translated as you, and it's probably what we should be learning. Lei is the formal/polite singular you, tu is the informal/familiar singular you. You distinguish between meanings by using a capital letter for the formal. However for strictly Duolingo purposes, lei means she. Also Loro is formal plural you, whereas voi is informal plural you. The formal/polite version is always what you should use when addressing strangers/elders, until they specifically give you permission to use informal language. That means you've made a friend! :P Hope I helped :)
This sentence doesn't really make any sense. An ingredient is something in a recipe, such as salt or sugar. Do they mean the food on the plate?
Another acceptable translation, according to Duo is: "She does not eat the ingredient in the dish." Perhaps she is lactose intolerant or has a nut allergy. This is a very elongated way to say that, but to say the sentence doesn't make sense is false.
I said 'she doesnt eat what is on the plate' - i know its not a literal translation but is it the same meaning
the sentence is clunky. We would normally say 'the ingredients' on the plate, rarely 'the ingredient'