1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: Russian
  4. >
  5. "Собаки не умеют летать."

"Собаки не умеют летать."

Translation:Dogs are unable to fly.

November 17, 2015



This is a sentence that's both factual and amusing enough to stick in the memory.


Not with that attitude.


Dogs can't fly......but pigs might.....


Свиньи тоже не умеют очень хорошо летать.


Thanks for pointing that out Duolingo, i was just about to throw my dog outside the window.


My understanding was that уметь tends to be used with a skill that is learned, otherwise мочь is the correct verb. Is that wrong, or would this be an unusual way to say this in Russian? Unless you're talking about being able to fly a vehicle.


Уметь is used with skills. Flying is a learnt skill even if you are a bird. Of course, with such an unfair skill, it works both ways: you may focus on the dogs', as a species, inability to fly ("не умеют")—or say that it is impossible for dogs to fly ("не могут", "не способны").

You can also say "Dogs do not fly" (Собаки не летают).


Thanks for the great explanation!

Of course, уметь would be the right verb if you're talking about this:


Yep. In that case it would not even be a joke.

The sentence's premise is obvious, of course, so it is not something you'll hear often. However, you might imagine a situation when being a bit sarcastic about dogs' lack of flying skills makes sense to mention. For example, if your friend decides to erect an overtly tall fence so that his dog does not run away from his backyard without anyone noticing.


"Hello ladies and gentlemen, yes, I am doggo, and I will be your captain today. Oh look, pigeons!"


Awwwww!!!! That is so cute!!!!


Could one translate this reasonably as "Dogs do not know how to fly"?


Yes, why not. We try to semi-consistently translate уметь as "know how to"—I am not sure how good it sounds.


While Schady_arc is correct that even birds need to learn to fly, nobody thinks about that while saying "Собаки не умеют летать." You can just say that and it wouldn't sound unnatural. The same would be with "Собаки не умеют разговаривать" etc.

Although "Собаки не могут/неспособны летать" и "Собаки не летают" would be more semantically correct.


It is natural that native speakers have an intuitive understanding of which words work well together.

What I meant is that there are certain criteria that should be met when we use «уметь» with the name of some action. The easiest metaphor here is that of "skill", a grasp of how doing certain actions correctly and in the correct order lets you perform well in some activity (still, you have to possess the "equipment", too). For example, if your dog has both its hind legs severely damaged, you can say "My dog cannot run" in English but you cannot say "Моя собака не умеет бегать" in Russian.


Why can't I ? :) Luckily, I can say almost anything in Russian.

But seriously, I would use that phrase on some occasions.

On the other hand, there are some situations where we won't use "не умеет" while having the same pretext (is unable to).

When there is a certain condition: "he can't (is unable to) breathe" or "he is unable to tell red from green" In both cases we'll only use "не может". Well, obviously, you know that, but anyway.

As for the original phrase, I thought that most cases when one will hear "слоны не умеют играть на трубе"/"собаки не умеют летать" is when one talks to a child. And there almost everything goes.


Кроме собаки Лайка


That's the weirdest video I watched in a while. Thank you.


Wow, you learn all sorts of fun facts from Duolingo.


“Are unable to “ = “cannot”, which should be accepted!


Таки это переводится: "Dogs can't fly".


As far as I am aware


I wrote "Dogs cannot learn how to fly"


Despite this fact, they still all go to heaven.


Летать multidirectional/abstract, and лететь unidirectional?

Learn Russian in just 5 minutes a day. For free.