When you use just an adjective without a noun, you use nominative case.
In fact, the word "is" itself serves two different funtions in these two cases. In one, it means that one thing is an example (or identical to) another, e.g. "she is a girl." In the other, it means that the subject has a certain property, e.g. "she is evil."
Zła is angry, not mad. I know in English is synonims but in Poland is diffrent
I assumed that it is the same difference than in french : - angry is when you're upset - mad is being crazy
I wrote "she is wrong" and it said it was incorrect. Even though the translation said "wrong". Can someone tell me why??
"Zły" in meaning "wrong" can be used only for things. For example "złe krzesło" (wrong chair - that blue one is the one I need, not this red). There's no such a usage for people.
Could this "bad" be used in the sense of "being mean" and "being bad at something"? Thanks :)
In Polish "zły" can mean bad, wrong, evil or angry. "Mean" is "złośliwy". There's no such a construction like "being bad at something" - we don't have a word for that.
You can say "on robi to źle" (he does it badly) if you mean that someone is bad at doing (!) something, etc.
If you want to say that someone is bad at something, you should use something similar, just like "On nie umie (can not, doesn't know how to do...)/nie rozumie (doesn't understand) matematyki (maths)." If you have any doubts, notify me.
But there is an adverb słabo, which apart from its literal meaning weakly/poorly, is also used in few set phrases:
słabo się czuć – 1) (z czegoś) to feel weak (at something) 2) to feel sick/nauseated/faint
słabo (komuś) się robi – (somebody) is getting sick/nauseated/faint
I did use Zła as in Croatian it means evil,it said i was wrong and corrected me to mean ˝bad˝
I realised i used ˝evil˝ in the fruit example,maybe that's why,or i must have just mistyped
How can one word be translated to "wrong" and "evil?" In English, there is a huge difference between those two words. If I say, "You are wrong," it means something entirely different from "You are evil." Please explain!
"zły" can just have many meanings, it's how it is. It's sometimes hard to use because of that. It can be 'bad', 'evil', 'angry'...
But it cannot mean "wrong" in "you are wrong". It can mean it in "wrong answer".
um, I literally can't get this right because it marks the right answer wrong?
Do POL->ENG exercises have 'check all the correct answers' tasks? If yes, then this one has both "She is bad" and "She is evil" as the starred answers.
If no, then I guess it was a bug :/
You can't tell from just "zła", so it depends on the context. Precising what she's angry at could help though: "Ona jest zła na ciebie." (she's mad at you).
Is there a nominative and instrumental version of zła?
Like on jest zwierzęciem and on to zwierzę (he is an animal)
"Is there?" Well, sure there is, every adjective and every noun has a form for every case.
It just won't work here: you won't say "Ona jest złą" on its own. Noun phrases can take Instrumental in such phrases (Ona jest złą kobietą), but a standalone adjective just takes Nominative.
As a native speaker, the Pilish means "She is angry" not "evil" you would need to use a differert phrase like "niedobra"
"zła" can easily mean both. "niedobra" doesn't sound (to me) serious enough for "evil".
Look, context is important to meaning and it generally doesn't translate from one language to another. While "niedobra" has the contextual meaning of "bad/naughty", it's way more appropriate for everyday use which is what this app is supposed to be teaching. If you prefer, you could also use "złą osobą" which is "evil person" but "zła" in this context, without the person part, means angry.
Why is the woman evil and the man bad ? Mad bad and evil don't mean the same thing