"Tanie spodnie nie są wygodne."

Translation: Cheap trousers are not comfortable.

[Jack.Elliot]

The cheap pair of trousers are not comfortable.

Is a correct translation

[Jellei]

Added "pair of" versions.

[Hanna720876]

thanks guys for replays)))

[Jack.Elliot]

Just as in a pair of shoes.

[Alex_Kinsey]

True, though I interpreted the meaning here as "(pairs of) trousers" and not just one pair. Having said that "a cheap pair of trousers is not comfortable" would carry the same meaning I guess. Did the programme suggest "a pair of trousers are" as a valid answer? If it did, report it.

[elbose86]

If you're talking solely about the trousers without 'pair' we would use the 3rd person plural: My trousers are dirty, Where are my trousers? etc.

[sirwootalot]

"Comfy" needs to be accepted as a valid translation for "wygodne". Cheap pants aren't comfy" and "Cheap trousers aren't comfy" were both rejected.

[Jellei]

A bit colloquial, but... okay, added.

[arminia11_web_de]

I disagree. The gentleman should be able to speak without using colloquial constructions.

[Ollyfer]

In the end, as long as the colloquial terms are not being translated differently from the less informal term, both options should be available, even though it might sound colloquial in the alternate translation. This course is primarily directed towards teaching a language in general, not to be finally able to converse with attendants of a black-tie assemblies.

[tyleryounesrocks]

Sounds like the name of a Taco Hemingway song

[Alex_Kinsey]

If I wanted to say "two pairs of trousers" would I have to use "dwoje" and would that take the genitive? or can "dwie pary" be used?

[MariaMazur0]

Dwie pary is the correct expression because "para" is a feminine word, and dwoje relates to a masculine gender.

[Hanna720876]

Hello guys) I don't understand : why there is a mistake when I write: a cheap trousers are not comfortable.

[Emwue]

'trousers' is a plurale tantum, that is, a word that exist as plural only. Rules of English grammar say that you shouldn't use indefinite article in front of plural nouns.

https://www.grammarly.com/handbook/grammar/articles/10/indefinite-article-with-a-plural-noun/

[Pagantekme]

Kapitalism is here too
Use second hand

[JaniceSchl1]

I'm wondering what cases this sentence is in.

[Jellei]

It's pretty basic, actually. It's just an "X is Y" sentence with Y being an adjective, so the fact that it's negated changes nothing... everything is in Nominative here.