32 Comments
187
That does not change anything about ducks being tasty. It only says that you wouldn’t experience it.
- 44
You are wrong taste is not univerebut subjective. There are plenty of people who would perceive the flesh of ducks as being not tasty - vegetarians and even non vegeterians. The sentence in question is a subjective Geschmacksurteil, as they say in the discipline of aesthetics. Peace out
People always think that a bird eating another bird is cannibalism but like... people are mammals. You know what else is a mammal? Pigs, cows, rabbits, sheep, so on
A ty, czy jeść ryby w wigilijna? (przepraszam, ja nie rozumiem po polsku dobrze. Uczę się, dla mojej babcia.)
Tak jem ryby. Don't worry, my Polish isn't very good either. That's interesting, uczę się polskiego, by porozmawiać z dziadkiem
Re Polish plural adjectives: "In plural, the form is the same as neuter singular, unless referring specifically to men or people in general." eg singular adj. {smaczny, smaczna. smaczne} > plural adj. {smaczne}. See LearnPolish24.com "Adjectives" -https://learnpolish24.com/home/artykul/1646/adjectives
Why is it "Kaczki są smaczne" and not "Kaczki są smaczna" ?
Kaczka is feminine, so even if it's plural, shouldn't it still use the same ending?
Well I'm vegan and I find this offensive. We're not Gods to decide whether an animal lives or die. Animals are not our food. They are sentient beings. They experience pain and love just like we do!
