Not a native speaker here, but having grown up surrounded by poor street French, I would fully understand "es-tu nouveau" and accept that as a translation for "are you new". Maybe a native speaker would have better input on it though.
It's something about formal, and not formal. I think "Est-ce que" is the more formal one.
From what I understand the "est-ce que" a. makes the sentence more formal, and b. indicates right away to the listener that a question is being asked.
But yes, I'm sure either "es-tu nouveau?" or tu-es nouveau?" said with a rising inflection would be fine for informal/casual use.
Actually, it is the other way round: inversion verb-subject in "es-tu nouveau ?" is more formal form then "est-ce que tu es nouveau ?" And regarding "tu es nouveau ?" as a 3rd, even less formal formal form then previous ones, it should be written without hyphen.
Es-tu nouveau is the same as est-ce que tu es nouveau.its just another way of asking question. And it all depends on the level of the speaker
I think I'm lost. "is it" and "are you" in one sentence that means just "are you". Why?
I may be wrong, but "est-ce que" is something you put in a sentence when you want to make a question. And it literally means "Is it that". So the sentence "Est-ce que tu es nouveau?" literally means "Is it that you are new?" I hoped i helped. :)
Yes, it literally means that (or so I have learned elsewhere), but it was not accepted here as an answer.
because you cant translate everything word by word. it doesnt work like that. you have to understand why the sentence is made like that. in this case, when you hear "est-ce que" you know its a question, and the thing that comes after is the main stuff. and also in english it doesnt make that much sense either, the sentence "is it that you are new?" so yeah, thats why it didnt accept it.
Actually, depending upon the context, it could make sense in English, albeit not commonly. I do get that it primarily signals a question in French, and that it is not intended to be translated literally. I submitted it as a matter of checking to see if it would accept it, not that I would have translated it in this way. Still I kinda sorta expected that it would accept the literal translation.
It could make sense in English, but then it wouldn't mean the same thing that it means in French. Therefore, it is not a good translation.
I think the phrase you're thinking of in english would be something along the lines of 'is it (because) you are new?" rather than being synonymous with "are you new?"
in such cases, I think it is better to treat such cases as new vocabulary rather than breaking it down... "est-ce que" means "are" in a question form! so in cases like "est-ce que tu es" you disregard "es" and you get "are you"
another case that can be treated as the same is "Qu'est-ce que" means "what are?"
as you go forward, you may find "est-ce que" and "Qu'est-ce que" is being used in a totally different way, and you end up to have more than one meaning.... which is common in many languages and they way to know the exact meaning would be the context....
take a simpler example: "lit" can mean "bed" and can mean " reading"...
you can learn to accept by sounding "est-ce que" and "Qu'est-ce que" in google ,or whatever, they sound much easier than the way its written
No, est-ce que is used to ask question, and in the context of est-ce que tu es nouveau it doesn't mean it is. Did i answer your question
I think, if you just started a job somewhere you could ask somebody else who worked there if they were new.
these question are really getting ridiculous. i cannot keep track of the words. this might as well be a "common phrases" lesson
No, because it didn't accepted young. I think it means more like "are you new here"?
I think because sont is verb conjugation for ils/elles. Es-tu nouveau should work.
They have different meanings in english, in that sentence, "that" can be the same as because, rather than just asking "are you new". Also, 'tu es' vs 'vous etes' and 'ils/elles/ons sont' the adjective nouveau would have to be modified accordingly (masculine/feminine, plurality). Using the phrase 'is it that' can be perfectly fine to help you understand the construction, but the meanings are slightly different.
"ons" ??! I thought that it only exists as "on" for 3rd person singular, for informal "nous", or for "one" in English....
I always thought of 'on' as an indefinite third person, ons very well may not be a thing, but I thought it was, haha.
Haha, it was a nice try. As I read here on posts, this "on" is becoming quite usual to use instead of "nous", followed by a verb in 3rd person singular, instead of one in 1st person plural after "nous".
I understand that est-ce is c'est flipped. When you flip you add a hyphen. Can anyone tell me the reason for the hyphen? I've noticed it in flips such as Parlez-vous as well.
the translation says that "est-ce que" means do you however in this sentence it means "are you"...thats quite confusing.
How might one say something more along the lines of, "Is it because you are new?" rather than just, "Are you new?" Merci.
Where does 'that' come from???? I had every word but 'that' and got it wrong. Why???