It is probably a joke, but... Anyway, "rodzina" in this question refers to your own family (a wife, children etc.).
Oh, okay, is there a specific term for family (your parents, grandparents, etc.)?
No rodzina means family and includes your grandfather's half-sister's great-granddaughter's husband.
But in some context it means parents with children/your spouse and children. But if you ask me that question I'll politely reply that yes, my parents are healthy and I'm currently flatmates with my cousin's daughter.
Just like in English, I guess. My family, based on context, might mean the people in my home (and closest relatives, if we don't live together), while it can also mean everyone you are related to.
Though I have always wondered, since we all share a common ancestor, where does family end and humanity begin?
At these times I am pretty happy that my native language has seperate words for this. It must be kind of confusing.
Is there a separate word in Polish for extended family and for near family?
I don't know how to explain it properly in English, but in my language we have "porodica" (you and your parents & grandparents/you and your spouse and kids) and "familija/rodbina" (other family, like aunts, uncles, cousins, great-grandparents, non-direct grandparents, etc.).
Well, we can just say "bliższa rodzina" and "dalsza rodzina" ('closer' and 'further').
Do you have a family,- spouce & kids Do you have family- further relations.
Hey! I have a question. Some verbs (like potrzeba) go with the genitive (like 'traditionally' or because they imply a vague 'possession'). Why isn't this the case with myć? I understand that myc goes with accusative? (and the negation probably with genitive?)
I have no idea why you ask it here, but myć=wash goes with accusative. Mieć = have also goes with accusative, and all verbs that go with accusative go with genitive when negated.
But I do not know where you had this imply vague possesion = genitive?
When the question is whose? and English people add 's at the end - Poles use genitive
Kasia's cat= kot Kasi
but if any "imply vague" verbs go with genitive - they are negative verbs, they imply need
I found a list of verbs, with genitive (according to this webpage http://portalwiedzy.onet.pl/140223,,,,dopelniacz,haslo.html)
negative verbs nienawidzić - hate; odmawiać- refuse; negować, brakować-lack
other verbs : bać się-be afraid of/fear, brakować/ braknąć lack, chcieć want, dokonywać/ dokonać manage, domagać siędemand, dotyczyć apply, concern, dotykać/ dotknąćtouch, doznawać/ doznaćfeel, lękać siębe afraid/fear, obawiać siębe afraid, fear, oczekiwaćwait, odmawiać/ odmówićrefuse, pilnować guard, look after, potrzebować need, pragnąćwant, próbować/ spróbowaćtry, słuchaćlisten, spodziewać się expect, szukać/ poszukaćsearch, look for, uczyć się/ nauczyć się learn, udzielać/ udzielić ??, unikać/ uniknąć avoid, używać/ użyć use, wymagać demand, wstydzić się be ashamed , wystarczać/ wystarczyć be enough, zabraniać/ zabronić forbid, zakazywać/ zakazać forbid, zapominać/ zapomnieć forget, zazdrościć be jealous, żałować regret, życzyć wish.
D występuje też z czasownikami z przedrostkami do- (w zn.: dodać coś do czegoś) oraz na- (w zn. osiągnąć cel), prefixes do- meaning add and -na meaning accomplish, reach target
np.: doczekać się, dokupić, dolać, dosypać, naczytać się, nagadać, naopowiadać, naznosić
someone made more coherent list here https://www.duolingo.com/comment/12459057
Thanks! I mixed up myć and mieć (I meant the last one ;))
So the genitive indicates possession (this was clear to me), so I thought with the verb 'mieć' (to have), the object with that verb actually is being possessed (in this case: a family). I was wondering why it isn't in accusative. Now i see that the appropriate question is 'whose' family... (And this object is absent in this sentence, so no genitive... :))
In German (which I see you're also studying) you also use have (haben) with the Accusative.
How does "you've family" make sense? It doesnt seem right to say that in english. We might say "you've got a family?" But not "you've family" ???
as a question it makes perfect sense in English to ask 'have you a family?' but not as you put it 'you've family'.
I think the only correct form is "Do you have a family?" as if we start with "have" automatically we imply asking for a past action: Have you been? or Have I died? I simply can't imagine a present question that start with "have", at least not now
But natives can, it turns out. Yesterday I watched "Dr. No", the first Bond movie, and I encountered two questions starting with "Have you" in present tense and not "Have you got" or "Do you have".
It was the first time I noticed that since Duolingo users have taught me that such a construction is also correct.
It seems to me that a question of that form, while indeed proper English grammer, is either much more common in UK English than US and Canadian English, or is somewhat of an old fashioned construct, or both.
A search a google ngrams shows for "have you a car/do you have a car/have you got a car" shows that the "have you" form was dominant in the 1940s but has declined: it is still used, but now half as common as "have you got" and 14 times less common than "do you have".
Is it just me or does the emphasis go on the second syllable with rodzinę? Where rodzina has emphasis on the first syllable
By emphasize you probably mean word stress. In Polish words the stress goes to the last syllable but one. So rodzina has the stress on the i.
I suppose you mixed it with the word родина in Russian where the stress is on the o.