"What do you want to read?"

Translation: Co chcesz przeczytać?

[vudin]

"Co chcesz czytać? " should be also accepted!

[Vasily16]

Reported too

[KirillKozlovsky]

No, it shouldn't. The lesson is devoted to perfective forms, so even though they are both translated as "read", only przeczytać should be accepted. Otherwise there is no point to the task.

[Vasily16]

You get this task not only in a specified section, but also as a standalone sentence in "strength your skills".

[lukas_hv]

Why the perfective, then? I want another reason than "because it is a task from the perfective section".

[Jellei]

Was "czytać" not accepted? To me, there are at least three options, and of course 'the perfective section' shouldn't matter.

"Co chcesz czytać?" - What do you want to read, generally?

"Co chcesz przeczytać?" - What do you want to read and finish reading?

"Co chcesz poczytać?" - What do you want to read a bit? (especially makes a lot of sense when reading to children)

[MichaelKor436367]

So, poczytać just means read a little? As in breeze over, glance at or survey a peice of writing?

[Jellei]

Just read for a while. "Przepraszam, chciałbym spokojnie poczytać!" (Excuse me, I would like to read (a bit) in peace) -> I have a free hour and an interesting book, so I'd like to read a bit.

[hersylia1234]

agree

[Veva392105]

And naczytać is a past action?

[Jellei]

I can only imagine "naczytać się", na- is a prefix suggesting 'doing something a lot'. Not exactly the most common verb.

Past action is usually "przeczytać" (the book is read, it's finished) but imperfective "czytać" works in the past as well.

[va-diim]

In Russian, Ćto chociesz procitat'? !