"Przeczytałabym książkę, ale nie mogę."
Translation:I would read a book, but I cannot.
27 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
Doesn't the verb "przeczytać" imply completion? Shouldn't an acceptable translation to this sentence be, "I would finish reading a/the book, but I cannot."?
What is the difference between "czytałabym książkę, ale nie mogę" and "przeczytałabym książkę, ale nie mogę"?
Dziękuję!
I think both of them would be worded in English in the same way. Or maybe the first would be "I would be reading"? Not sure.
"I would finish" is on one hand a good translation 'literally', but I don't think natives speak that way...
I agree. Perhaps "I would have read" comes closer to the Polish phrase, even if it isn't formally in the past tense. What say the natives?
Well, it is accepted. But "I would read" makes most sense to me.
If I'm saying "przeczytałbym książkę" (especially that this is just 'some book'), it doesn't mention anything about whether I already started reading the aforementioned book... probably even not.
1280
"Would have done" equates to Past Conditional in Romance languages. As far as I can see Polish doesn't distinguish between Present and Past Conditional forms, so perhaps it is possible here, but not, I think, in connection with "I can't".
It can only refer to the past, and doesn't really go with a verb in the Present Simple:
"I would have read the book, but I've been too busy lately"
"I would have read the book last week, but just didn't have the time"
But here "nie mogę" suggests we're talking about the present, so it would simply be "I would read". And this already has all the sense of completion we need.
- 1280
As far as the English is concerned, "would read" means that sometime in the future, a future that starts right now, I would start to read this book, with the intention of finishing it.
"I would be reading" means that if it had been possible I would have already started reading and been in the process of reading now. It is often used in what is known in the trade as a Mixed Conditional:
"I would be reading it at this moment if you hadn't borrowed it and lost it"
- 1280
When we say "I would read the book", it already has a sense of completion: when we start to read a book we generally intend to finish it. And if we didn't intend to complete it, we'd use a different verb, like "look at", for example.
On the other hand, "finish reading the book" only applies to the final process of reading a book, not reading the whole book. We'd never say it before we'd started reading.
For example, I have a book of 500 pages. I have already read up to Page 400, but for some reason stopped. Then I might talk of finishing it. But I'm pretty sure that in that case Polish would be using something like "skończyć". So I'm afraid I don't think it would really be a valid translation here.
Thanks! I'm still confused about this sentence, though - does this imply that the speaker is illiterate, or is "nie mogę" more ambiguous (maybe he was lazy, maybe he ran out of time, maybe he lost the book)? I would think "nie mogłam" would be the ambiguous or more normal way to say it, but I am probably WAY overthinking things. :)
This sentence doesn't specify the reason. To say that you are not capable of reading/you don't possess skills necessary for reading you should say: "Nie umiem czytać".
"Nie mogę" refers to the present. "Nie mogłam (she)" or "nie mogłem (he)" refers to the past.
As you were thinking "nie mogę" could be ambiguous, however in this context it means way, way more "I can't do this because I am busy" than "I can't do this because I can't read".
Other context, where "nie mogę" could be more directly translated is "Nie mogę tego przeczytać" (I can't read this - either because I can't read or I can't see the letter or I'm busy).
As mihxal said, if you don't possess the skill, you should say: "Nie umiem czytać" or "Nie potrafię czytać"
Hope this is not too fuzzy :P
"Przeczytałabym książkę, ale nie mogłam" for female
"Przeczytałbym książkę, ale nie mogłem" for male
Nie trzeba powtórzyć "ja" nie mogę. It is implied the"i" is there. Ja nie mogę = nie mogę
Yes. Actually it's stronger than "nie trzeba" (one doesn't need): "ja" before the first one (Ja przeczytałabym) is totally redundant, but correct. Adding "ja" in front of the second verb, if the subject is the same, would be totally weird, I think even wrong.
I would read THAT book -- why is it rejected? Could that not be meant with this sentence?
"cannot" and "can't" are accepted automatically when one of them is on the list of correct answers. That means that most likely you had a mistake (even a typo) somewhere else.
Why is "I would read a book, but cannot" not acceptable? I seems to me that these are equivalent, at least in American English.
Well... maybe it can work sometimes, but isn't repeating "I" the standard way of saying that?