1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: German
  4. >
  5. "Es kam wie es kommen musste."

"Es kam wie es kommen musste."

Translation:It came as it had to come.

January 25, 2014



is this idiomatic ?


Yes. "It was bound to happen." / "It was inevitable."


It's a nice idiom, sounds very poetic, like the beginning of some cowboy's reflections.

"It came as it had to come. The rains were strong in those days, and the new rivers hoed the bare earth better than any farmer, and carried many a careful plot with them. It was life and ruin all the same time."


The German sentence is idiomatic. But there is an (obligatory) comma missing before "wie".


Before "als", you have an obligatory comma (because "als" is a conjunction), but not before "wie", cf. the examples at https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/wie#Vergleichspartikel (because "wie" is a comparative particulate)


why should there be a comma?


There shouldn't be, see my answer to the original comment.


Should or should not ....


The English sentence certainly isn't.


That would be "It was bound to happen"


Shouldn't it accept: "It came how it must come" ?


That would be: "Es kam wie es kommen muss." "Musste" is past tense and translates to "had to" or "must have".


But "It came as it must come." is it accepted.


In a sentence like this, what are the rules that determine where the verbs are placed? It's confusing since there are three verbs in the sentence, two conjugated verbs (kam and musste) and one infinitive (kommen).


If I understand correctly, "es kam" is the main clause of the sentence, so the verb is in the second position. "Wie" makes the second clause into a subordinate clause, and subordinate clauses have the verb be last. If that sentence had not been a subordinate clause, it would have been "es musste kommen", but the fact that it's a subordinate clause pushes the main verb (musste) to the end of the clause. While these clauses can be annoying when you're learning, they allow you to change the word order a lot more, since this sentence could also be "wie es kommen musste, kam es" while being clearly different from "es musste kommen wie es kam". I hope this clarifies things instead of making it more complicated.


Great explanation! Thanks.


How about 'What will be will be'? This got a big red cross, but seems like an idiomatic equivalent to me,


Would "es kam wie es kommen müssen" mean the same thing?


You want "müss," not "müssen"--to agree with "es." But that would mean "It came as it has to come," which doesn't make sense. If it "has to come," then it's going to come in the future, but it "came" in the past


Okay, so is it okay to say "It came like it's supposed to come" ?


I think you'd have to have the whole sentence in the past tense: "It came like it was supposed to come."


Man... this keeps getting harder!


This was a jawbreaker for me the first time I hit it. But I put it on a sticky on my desktop - as I usually do with sentences I find difficult - and let it sit there. Read it sometimes. Repeated it sometimes. Now I can rattle it right off, and thus confuse my friends and baffle my enemies. ;-)


Hahaha! Great, I probably need to post-it my Duolingo issues :P


I calculated it would take 1.4 billion utterances before saying this sentence!


Would a native German actually use this phrase?


I thought "It was bound to happen" was determined to be a correct answer? I just lost a point.


I put "The inevitable happened", but the inevitable happened and it was marked wrong!


It sounds to me like the are saying 'es kam wie es KAMEN musste'


Put 'how' instead of 'as'. Felt a bit harsh it was rejected tbh.


Why not ''it came as if it had to come''?


I'm not sure what that sentence would mean. The "if" doesn't really make sense there. But "wie" just means "like" or "as" or "how"--there's no "if" in the German sentence.


Hmm, maybe it's just a slight variation in dialect, because I would not say "It came as it had to come" or "it looks as it will rain" but I might say "it came as if it had to come" and "it looks as if it will rain." I would normally use "like" instead of "as if" but never just "as".


I completely agree with your "rain" sentence--I would say "as if" or "like" there, too. Now that I think about it, your "as if it had to come" sentence does make sense, but I'd say it means something slightly different from the German sentence.

The German sentence ("as") implies that "it" was predicted or forced to come, and "it" came according to that prediction, "as/because it had to." It's the same sense as "He tripped and fell, as I told him he would." (I told him he would fall, and indeed he did.)

Your version ("as if") means that "it"'s coming implies that "it" was forced to come. It's the same sense as, e.g., "He looked scared, as if he'd seen a ghost." (Looking scared implies that he saw a ghost.) You would use "als ob" to translate this to German: "Es kam, als ob es kommen musste."


Ohh, Danke für die Erklärung! Yeah, I see now. Why I was confused was that I always did think of the sentence as saying that "it" was forced to come instead of it having been predicted or expected to come.

Thanks again.


It went how it had to go isn't accepted but I think that's the way we'd say it in English. "It came as it had to come" sounds a little unusual.


this did not make any sense in english....(if not vaguely dirty)


I have never heard this phrase before. Native speaker


Suggest "It had to happen" as idiomatic English equivalent - which was marked wrong - and that "it'd" is impossible here.


"It came as it should come" Wrong, but why?


"Musste" is past tense, and the verb "müssen" is closer to "must / have to" than "should." So "It came as it had to come."


Why can't the kommen be dropped as in other sentences?


I love that they include idiomatic expressions; however, they should use the equivalent in English. Just saying "It came as it had to come" will not help the learner to know that it's like "It's bound to happen" or vice versa if the goal is to help someone know what to use in a given situation. Es kam wie es kommen musste Translation: It's bound to happen (lit. It came as it had to come)


The English translation for this needs to change. "It came as it had to come" doesn't mean anything in English. If this is idiomatic, the translation should be the equivalent English idiom, not the literal word-for-word translation.


would this be right: "it came as it mussed come." ?


There is no English word "mussed" as past tense of must. "Must" has no past tense, so one must use "had to" or "must have" instead.


"Mussed" is the past tense of "muss": to make (someone's hair or clothes) untidy or messy. (See: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/mussed ). It is not the past tense of must.


we never use "mussed" even for that :)


I agree, the usage is rare, but now you can buy a product that promises: "Sexy, Mussed Up Hair From The Drugstore". (See: http://www.xojane.com/beauty/bedhead-in-a-bottle-sexy-mussed-up-hair-from-the-drugstore)! : )


"mussed up" is the way that's used

Learn German in just 5 minutes a day. For free.