"I love my wife because she is a fascinating woman."
Translation:אני אוהב את אישתי בגלל שהיא אישה מרתקת.
10 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
Dovbear57 and others say that biglal should be followed by a noun, but radagast, a native speaker, said no, something like biglal she-yored geshem is correct.
I think of this as the “whom conundrum”. Most people avoid using whom because it’s seen as stilted and pretentious, or they don’t know how to use it properly. So the time of turbulence is between when whom was part of common speech, and when whom disappears from common speech.
Here’s an example of a word whose time of turbulence is past. In the 1600s, “resent” could be used positively. In 1677, for instance, Isaac Barrow, Newton’s teacher and predecessor in Cambridge, wrote in one of his sermons: “Should we not be monstrously ingratefull (sic) if we did not deeply resent such kindness?”
As the 17th century drew to a close, the positive sense of “resent” gradually faded away. Until it disappeared altogether, there would’ve been people who insisted that the positive meaning of “resent” could be “correct”, (the old usage), just as people insist now that biglal-she cannot be “correct” (the old usage).
This “resent” example comes from Guy Deutscher’s book The Unfolding Of Languages.