"I have the fish."

Translation:Mam rybę.

July 24, 2016



Why two different endings for ryby ?

July 24, 2016

  • 2004

You mean "ryby" and "rybę"?

"ryby" - is plural (Nominative and Accusative) form of "ryba" (and singular Genetive as well). "rybę" is singular Accusative form of "ryba".

"I have the fish" means "Mam rybę". "Mam ryby" should be translated as "I have the fishes".

If Duo marks you wrong for "Mam rybę", please report it.

I can think of using Polish plural here only if the English sentence was "I have fish" - without the "the". A fish seller could say something like that thinking of more than one fish that he has for sale.

July 26, 2016

  • 926

"Fish" is both singular and plural in English. "The" just means that it was specified earlier, so I don't see any problem with "the fish" either for singular or plural.

July 26, 2016

  • 2004

Yeach, after rethinking it I admit that you are right. The plural form of "fish" (fish/fishes) depends on the context that wasn't given here.

So "mam ryby" can be translated either as "I have the fish" or as "I have the fishes".

However the question asked by Puechgaubil concerned the reverse translation in which - I guess - only "mam ryby" was accepted as the correct answer.

July 27, 2016


'Fish' is both singular and plural in English, so 'mam rybę' and 'mam ryby' both translates to 'I have the fish'. English 'fishes' is used when talking about species of fish. If you went to a marine museum and said you saw two fish, that would mean you saw two individual fish. But if you said you saw two fishes, that'd mean you saw a few individual fish of two different fish species.

Polish 'ryba' and 'ryby' doesn't do that distinction. Both refer to individual fish, but plural talks about more than one. The species (gatunek) matter is a different kettle of fish whatsoever. ;)

July 28, 2016
Learn Polish in just 5 minutes a day. For free.