"A bírók tanárok."

Translation:The judges are teachers.

July 31, 2016



Just curious, because of the free word order in Hungarian could this also be the teachers are judges, or when the verb is absent is it assumed the first noun is the subject?

July 31, 2016


No, it is not necessarily the first noun. But you did not only switch the two nouns. You also detached the article "the" from "referees/judges" and attached it to "teachers". And that is what reverses the relationship, just like in English.

"A bírók tanárok" - "Tanárok a bírók"
"The referees are teachers" - "Teachers are the referees"

These two are more or less the same. Logically, all of the referees are teachers, but some teachers are not referees.

And with the transplanted article:

"Bírók a tanárok" - "A tanárok bírók"
"Referees are the teachers" - "The teachers are referees"

Here, all of the teachers are referees, but some referees are not teachers.

The word order is not even close to free. It is just more flexible than English, because all the important details that define the role of a word are actually glued to the words as prefixes and suffixes, in most cases. So you have more freedom in moving the words around.

July 31, 2016


A bírók tanárok, because they "teach" guilty people a lesson ;)

July 1, 2017


How do I know that tanárok is the accusative and bírók the subject? the -t suffix is not being used.

August 16, 2016


There's nothing accusative (in either English or Hungarian). There's a subject and a predicate nominative.

August 26, 2016


The -t suffix is not being used because tanárok is not accusative.

September 10, 2016


The 'are' bit is omitted?

October 10, 2016


Yes. 'A bírók tanárok vannak.' is not a well-formed sentence in Hungarian.

October 26, 2016
Learn Hungarian in just 5 minutes a day. For free.