"Nigdy nie pokazywałyście mi waszego samochodu."
Translation:You have never shown me your car.
17 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
It's difficult especially in such sentences. I'd say that imperfective is usually default in negative sentences (it just never happened, so it's a whole ongoing process of not happening), but you can very easily imagine using perfective. My feel about this sentence would be like this:
"nie pokazywałyście" = your sisters start talking to you about their car, saying 'oh, you know how bad our car is, the mirrors are about to fall down and it has problems starting' and you say 'no, I don't know, you actually never shown it to me'.
"nie pokazałyście" = your sisters were supposed to show it to you, but somehow it didn't happen. So it's like a broken promise, a bit.
That's at least how I would interpret the difference.
So are you saying that in negative sentences Imperfective is usually used because Imperfective denotes an "incomplete" action, and by definition if it didn't happen it's incomplete? Well, I won't argue with you that that's how these verbs are used in Polish, but it seems to me that the intention of defining Imperfective as an "incomplete" action is not that it didn't take place, but rather that it's pending or in progress. Please correct me if I'm wrong, or if you have any other thoughts. This is just not quite adding up to me (and I thought I had a pretty good understanding of aspect). I understand that some things just are the way they are, and I can accept that if that's all there is in this case.