I apologize for asking the same questions, but why "κοτόπουλο"?
I can understand "η κοτόπουλη σούπα" - "η σούπα" is feminine, so "κοτόπουλη", as an adjective, concords in number (singular form) and gender with "η σούπα"
I can understand "η σούπα κοτόπουλου" - "το κοτόπουλο" gets in genetive case by analogy with "ο χυμός πορτοκαλιού".
But what part of speech is "κοτόπουλο"?
Sorry for my meticulousness in attempt to understand the logic of this linguistic construction.
Η σούπα κοτόπουλο is short of η σούπα με κοτόπουλο (soup with chicken). Η σούπα κοτόπουλου is right also. Κοτόπουλο is a noun so it does not become κοτόπουλη etc. It is rare that someone says η σούπα κοτόπουλο or η σούπα κοτόπουλου but both are valid. It is more common to say "κοτόσουπα". But this construction is common for other foods such as "τάρτα κεράσι" cherry pie, "χυμός πορτοκάλι" orange juice so the nominative is also valid unless the noun that characterizes is in the plural, then only genitive is used. P.e You cannot say "κέικ φρούτα" for fruit cake. The right is "κέικ φρούτων". But "κέικ πορτοκάλι" is right. I hope i didn't confuse you with too much info.
Ha-ha, the clue was in omitted "με"! There are a lot of similar tasks/sentences in this theme, which was puzzling me, but your answer solved all my misunderstanding))
Thank you very much!
It can be an omitted με or απο (made of). Χυμός απο πορτοκάλι for example= Χυμός πορτοκάλι
It is certainly not rare at all for someone to say "σούπα κοτόπουλο"!! :D All these phrases may have different popularity in different regions, families etc. while of course some are clearly not viable options, like "κέικ φρούτα", or may be becoming old-fashioned.
Hello, is there do you know a logical reason for the genitive to be compulsory with the plural? Thanks for your explanations
First of all, κοτόπουλο is a noun and as a noun it has a grammatical gender that is neutral. As such it will always by κοτόπουλο. I like troll1995's explanation that as a noun characterizing another noun is acting like an adjective and for this reason it comes after the noun that is being characterized. Examples I can think of: "ο καλός λύκος" = "the good wolf" but "Ο λύκος φάντασμα" = "the ghostly wolf"
ο λύκος-φάντασμα (notice the dash!) is a different case meaning the wolf that is also a ghost, while σούπα κοτόπουλο means soup (with) chicken.
Well, I think that κοτόσουπα is a better word and it's more widely used than σούπα κοτόπουλο.
Why is the adjective after the noun here, when it has been before in other cases?
I see. So in Greek if you have an adjective noun, it comes after, eh? Otherwise it comes first, so like: Κάλο λύκος (Good wolf) Σκύλος αρκούδα (bear dog)
It's καλός λύκος because the adjective must be masculine because the noun λύκος is masculine too. Well we call bear dogs αρκουδόσκυλα. Word to word translation don't always work. Keep in mind that you place the characterizing noun after the characterized one and mostly in the genitive. Orange juice=Χυμός (από) πορτοκάλι=χυμός πορτοκαλιού, chicken soup=Σούπα (με) κοτόπουλο= σούπα κοτόπουλου. But It's not right to assume that because in English a "bear dog" is two words, it has to be so in Greek, or that it is described the same way.
I understand that, I am merely speaking grammatically. Is that a correct way to describe a dog as being bearish? I understand you may have a special word for it, but I need to insure I understand the rule here.
A bear dog is σκύλος-αρκούδα. You should use a dash in this case. Another example is λέξη-κλειδί (keyword). Compound words are very common in Greek though. "Αρκουδόσκυλος" sounds more colloquial, while σκύλος-αρκούδα is more formal.