"Ea nu este copil."

Translation: She is not a child.

[kkutsu]

Is there some reason why the answer isnt ea nu este un copil?

[Archybalds]

No, the sentence is perfectly fine :D

[wyqtor]

No, it is perfectly fine, report it!

[gotham23]

Pula măti

[Karen03195]

The English misses the article, it does in quite some sentences ;)

[ALLintolearning3]

Actually, the English sentence requires the indefinite article "a". It is not required in Romanian.

[jasonbc123]

Since it's perfectly fine to say either way, it more typically common to say it 'Ea nu este copil' instead of 'Ea nu este un copil'?

[GeoMan2]

Both are fine to use and they have the same meaning. I cannot say right now a difference between them (except the article). I can only notice here, that english language is not so flexible as romanian, and you cannot use child without "a" article.

[jasonbc123]

Mulțumesc! Yes, I have noticed that there are a lot of things that can be omitted and just implied in Romanian. I guess my only concern at this point is when to determine when words are implied in a sentence or when they can be used.

[TFG]

Is there a reason this is an incorrect English translation?

[ALLintolearning3]

We cannot see your English translation, but in English the indefinite article "a" is required and cannot be omitted as it can be omitted in Romanian.

[Jackel98]

Does this better translate to English as "She is no child?"

[jasonbc123]

Not precedes a noun that has an article. So therefore, the proper way to read this in English is "She is not a child"

[kristina714177]

You dont have to add in "un"

[Nabil520203]

why its Ea Nu Este Copil not Ea Este Nu Copil ?

[Andrei926539]

Nu is always before the verb.

[DracoMalfoy2021]

So is "Ea" is she in Romanian?

[BrentFoste4]

Yes