"Ea nu este copil."
Translation:She is not a child.
18 Comments
- 22
- 18
- 17
- 17
- 16
- 16
- 15
- 15
- 15
- 15
- 15
- 15
- 13
- 13
- 12
- 11
- 10
- 10
- 10
- 9
- 9
- 8
- 7
- 5
- 4
- 4
- 3
- 2
- 2
- 1324
No, it is perfectly fine, report it!
- 21
- 421
Since it's perfectly fine to say either way, it more typically common to say it 'Ea nu este copil' instead of 'Ea nu este un copil'?
- 25
- 12
- 11
- 9
- 27
Both are fine to use and they have the same meaning. I cannot say right now a difference between them (except the article). I can only notice here, that english language is not so flexible as romanian, and you cannot use child without "a" article.
- 21
- 421
Mulțumesc! Yes, I have noticed that there are a lot of things that can be omitted and just implied in Romanian. I guess my only concern at this point is when to determine when words are implied in a sentence or when they can be used.
- 21
- 421
Not precedes a noun that has an article. So therefore, the proper way to read this in English is "She is not a child"
I think there should be written "Ea nu este un copil"...or I do not catch drama right
