"The chicken is on the plate."
Translation:Il pollo è nel piatto.
87 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
Why is Il pollo è nel piatto correct? The chicken is in the plate? Can nel be used interchangeably with sul? This really confuses my simple mind.
In italian they say something is "In the plate" in the same way that we would say something is "On the plate". But nel does not necessarily mean on.
It isn't logical. It depends on the language. Sometimes there is no logic and sometimes there are different logics / concept behind using different preposition. In French you say "à la mur" for "on the wall" and you say "à la maison" for "at home" and you say "à la discotéque" for "in the disco". So no logic at all in my opinion.
Yes sul can be used. I just used il pollo e' sul piatto at it was marked correct.
just curious, of "sul" or "nel", which is more likely to be used in normal conversation?
Speaking of a plate, I'd say in (nel, nei); su isn't wrong of course, but I'd mostly use it for trays rather than plates.
Sull' is the truncation of sullo, or su+lo, but it's "il piatto", not "lo piatto", so it should be "sul piatto".
2971
It told me to say "il pollo sta sul piatto." But I realized the reason I was counted wrong was I used "est" instead of "è". Dumb mistake, but I understand now.
The difference is whether you are talking about composition or location. "Sul" refers to the location of something: the chicken is (located) on/upon the plate. "Nel" refers to both a location and a composition. If you were to use it in this context above, the significance would render a meaning like: chicken is (used) in this plate/dish/meal/food. It might be the reply to the question: which dishes have chicken in them? The chicken is nel (this) dish.
Sul, sull suo....never come across any...how am i meant to fet that right!
Duolingo: doesn't teach me what "sul" means I: get the question wrong Duolingo: :o
Sullo is only used before masculine nouns beginning with 's + consonante' or the letter 'z.' Hope this helps!
You would have to put "sul", because the definite article for plate is il and not lo, hence sullo."Sul piatto" is accepted, however.
Because there are two forms of 'in the' that are used for the masculine singular. 'nel' and 'nello'. The latter is only used when the word following it begins with s+consonant, z, and maybe a couple of other rare things that I can't remember off the top of my head. Since 'piatto' doesn't fall under this it's 'nel piatto'
OK, possibly three nell' if the following word begins with a vowel sound (late edit)
thanks. discussion so not helpful. but your language your preposition. own it. sul tavolo nel piatto
it's tricky, there is no chicken in the sentence: 'il piatto sta sul piatto' = the plate is on the plate :)
Something that bothers me about Duolingo is that it doesn't teach you which words are masculine, feminine or neutral, and which words are changed by the gender and how. We're forced to learn it by ourselves, which is sometimes impossible. What I could never tell is what word is changed by what. I thought that the verb is conjugated based on the gender of the subject, but that was disproved when I saw mangia go with a masculine word. Can someone explain to me how this all works? I'm needlessly lost.
ejh, you seem really lost. did you sleep through the previous 10 or so lessons? mangia is a verb. verbs change by the person (i, you, she, ... -> io mangio, tu mangi, lei mangia, ...), and not by the gender (and it is like this in other languages too). the gender thing is for nouns, when they get prepositions and adjectives and these kind of things. e.g. la ragazza, il ragazzo, la camicia grigia, la gonna rosa, il pinguino azzurro, ... maybe it is an old comment and you already found out, hopefully, just don't want this to confuse someone else too. and actually it teaches the gender by putting there la/il/... before the nouns quite often
Because that would be the chicken is in/on the the plate since nel = in+il
In English I'm pretty sure we use "chicken" as meaning "chicken meat" rather than "one chicken"; in Italian would you ever use "i polli" for a sentence like this? (I noticed that it is okay to say "le caramelle" for "candy" even though it technically directly translates as "the candies" [I think].)
- 142
I polli would be plural and mean two or more chicken (alive or cooked). "il pollo" can be used both to mean "the chicken" and "chicken meat".
Sorry, but ALL of my translations showed.... nel... None showed sul as shown in the answer at top of this page???? Anybody else see "nel" on their choices? I do know that to use -nel- means the chicken is IN the plate. -sul- means ON the plate. Wonder what happened with the switch?
Those are both 'on the', where the thing it is on is a masculine singular noun, but if the word following sul begins with a s+consonant or a few other combinations (su + lo) it is spelled sullo but if it is a normal consonant it's just sul
On the previous multiple choice, "il cibo è NEL piatto" was the wrong answer. And i have just had a sentence that said "Il pollo è SUL piatto". This is confusing because when to use "sul" and "nel"?
Why? Italians tend to use 'nel' for food on plates. It is important to remember that prepositions especially do not always map one to one across languages. Italians talk about food being in plates, rather than on them. English tends to use in for deep plates like bowls, but on for flat plates like normal dinner plates or platters. But that's just a convention. Best to use what the Italians use. And word of advice. Read the comments before posting. You may find your concern addressed.
The phrase:The chick is ON the plate The answer: The chicken is IN the plate. Shouldn't the answer be: SUL piatto versus NEL piatto
‘On the plate’ feels as if it should be ‘sul’. Why ‘in the plate’? One of the oddities of translation in languages I guess’
Yup, which is the reason Italians get prepositions wrong when they speak English. Either way is equally logical.
E.g. we use "on" for plate and "in" for bowl. In both cases the food is both "in" the center of the item but "on" the surface of the item.
When we say something is "in" a bowl, we don't mean that it is somewhere inside the porceline making up the bowl, but just within the space in the middle of its structure. The thing that's "in" the bowl is still external to the bowl. Now try imagine extending that idea to the plate. There is probably also another language that would go the opposite way and say "on" the bowl.
Why wouldn’t it be: Il pollo STA nel piatto? In Spanish we would say “el pollo está en el plato”
Yup, Italian is not Spanish. Several Southern dialects tend to overuse stare (unsurprisingly given the long Spanish domination) but in standard Italian when it comes to location stare expresses permanent or usual ones.
In the comments here it says it's e nel, but I'm my answers it says e Sul is correct. I don't even have nul as an option...
Is anyone else seeing "sul" instead of "nel"? I got this wrong because I had to guess between three words I've never seen before, but i think duolingo thinks the word "nel" is there instead of "sul"
I'm confused. For a long long time the exercises would use "nel piatto"... and for some reason now I got "sul piatto". Can someone explain that and whether there is some difference in usage or so? I'd be grateful
I don't understand. For a long time the exercise would use "nel piatto" and now it changed for "sul piatto". Why and is there some difference in usage or so? I'd appreciate some explaination...
There is a mistake in duolingo as it is telling me that il polo è nel piatto is wrong when the answer is the same .tks
I find it remarkable how when i read this chat thread all i "feel" are a bunch of people trying to be heard by ripping each other apart. All your voices are fueled from your egos. Just calm down...relax...we're all here to learn italian and jabe some fun. Lets help each other and hear each other. When someone offers an answer to your question...they are trying to help you. No one is forcing you to agree with the rationale offered. Why get so defensive when someone else doesnt provide you with an answer to your satisfaction? I wish more people could see the good in others as the human default. When did our 'default' become so ruthless? To all those that made an attempt to explain, thank you! I personally get what you're trying to convey...:) cheers!
Why the lesson teach me "Il pollo è nel piatto", but in the question give me the answer is "Il pollo è sul piatto"?
Il pollo è sul piatto?? That's the first time "sul" has come up. Am i expected to be a soothsayer?
Because nel = in+il so here you have 'the chicken is on/in the the plate'
They remind you if you leave off the accent marks, but on the mobile app which is on the phone the keyboard does not have easily accessible accent marks.
Why is "il pollo e nel il piatto" incorrect? Does italian just dont use the article if it is in/on something?
