"She cried after she spoke to you!"

Translation: Ea a plâns după ce a vorbit cu tine!

[LouisSepdekdu]

Isn't "a vorbi cu" best translated as "to speak with"?

[D3XT3RY0NuT]

Yes, it is. "to speak to" translates as "a vorbi cuiva". Therefore, the correct answer should be "Ea a plâns după ce ți-a vorbit!" or "Ea a plâns după ce v-a vorbit!".

[mapuca1]

I understand that you can omit the "ea" in the second half of the sentence. But is it wrong to use it? "Ea a plâns după ce EA a vorbit cu voi/tine"

[D3XT3RY0NuT]

No, it is not. It might sound a bit unnatural in certain situations, but it is definitely correct.

[ocalex86]

Why do we need to add ce after după?
Is "Ea a plâns după a vorbit cut tine" wrong?

[ovidiu_nl]

Yes, "ce" is necessary here.

[olb38]

A question abous snchronization between tences. " ei au stiut bine ce fac" is the correct answer accordingly DL rules (the program decides when and what is wrong or wright) and we have past tence in first part and present - in second. Here in this sentence in romanian again both parts are in past. Can somebody explain what this means - both situations are allowed in romanian or something is wrong with examples and only one is possible!?