1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: Italian
  4. >
  5. "Effettivamente loro hanno ra…

"Effettivamente loro hanno ragione."

Translation:Actually, they are right.

March 4, 2014



can effettivamente not also mean effectively??

  • 1162

I'll like to think so, but as at today (June 16, 2017) it is not accepted.


Efficamente is used for effectively. Effettivamente means actually.


Is "they are actually right" actually wrong here?


Insomma sì, ma effettivamente no :)

They mean the same thing but the emphasis is on the "actually/effettivamente" part.


'Indeed, they are right' should be accepted


If anyone wants further knowledge about effettivamente, here are some links:

Wiktionary doesn't list effectively as a translation: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/effettivamente

With examples of usage - the examples seem to suggest against effectively: http://it.bab.la/dizionario/italiano-inglese/effettivamente

Duolingo's own dictionary: https://www.duolingo.com/dictionary/Italian/effettivamente-adverb/84b5479d683a3b1997071f5347d1d192.

I did more research than above, but it was fruitless, so not worth sharing. If any one in the know about effettivamente, effectively and actually wishes to provide guidance for us learners, that would be good.

Meanwhile (caveat, I'm a learner, so this is guesswork) I suspect from the fact that effectively is not already accepted, that there is a nuance here that the course contributors wish to convey. If so, it could be that effettivamente (and actually) in this sentence means the reality is that they are right, whereas effectively would mean the reality is that they are not right, but it doesn't really matter because it works out the same (very roughly for both sentences).


I think that means that unless you have the context, you cannot give a 100% definitive translation of effettivamente


Thanks for all the research. I see your point about the distinction between 'actually' and 'effectively', and agree with you. But it is confused by DL offering 'in effect' as a translation, and Wiktionary gives 'in effetti' as a synonym. Surely 'in effect' and 'effectively' mean the same thing? So it does look like DL is being a bit inconsistent here.


Why is the translation of "effettivamente" to "basically" wrong?


Well "basically" means more something that is explained in a more basic form. "Actually" is to explain something that is different to how someone or something had explained it before.


I wrote 'Actually they have reason' which was rejected. I now understand the idiom avere ragione = being right, but what makes this sentence wrong?


It seems to me that '' to have reason'' means in english ''to be a logical creature generally''. Fits better like this: ON THAT CASE they are right=IN QUESTO CASO hanno ragione.


just like "I am 20" "I am hungry/thirsty"


This transaltion was accepted for me April 22 2019


I put "Actually they have reasons." and it was marked wrong, which I don't fully understand.


Reasons would be "ragioni"!


it does not seem convincing that, given effetto = effect, 'effettivamente' cannot be translated as 'effectively', even if in Italian it also means actually


Yes , I agree, that is the point really. in the sentence given, effectively or actually would not be remiss in an English translation.


I wrote "actually, they have a point". Can it be correct, or is it completely off?


"They have a point" doesn't really mean that they are right, only partially or that they are saying that they understand where they are coming from.


"in effect, they are right" is IN EFFECT RIGHT and correct English! This is where and when duoLingo is IN EFFECT WRONG!


Really was given as a hint for effettivamente so I put ' They are right really' which is common English useage but DL marked it wrong of course but in essence it means the same as the answer given!


'Effectively they are right' should be the right answer but it won't accept it. Isn't actually - veramente or davvero


Checking my dictionary Duo is correct, effettivamente = acutally and attualmente = currently. There is one thing about Duo, they make you work for it, don't they?


Ragione, regione. Am I supposted to know two so similiar words?


Yes! English is not any different:- Simple sample think thing show shoe ragged rigged part pert clever cleaver sleeves sieves and so on..... ; )


Why is loro required? It seems redundant in this instance unless the correct translation is, "Actually they have their reasons."


Normally, the 'loro' is only added for emphasis. So this seems to be saying, "Actually, THEY are right".


this was my answer to the preceding problem which was translate « actually they are right » and it was marked as incorrect. veramente should have been used. Veramente does NOT mean actually.


"Effectively " not accepted, but Google translate gave effectively not actually.


Thank you Germanforme22. The whole string keeps arguing about effectively. That is a different word in Italian. I made the same mistake and you straightened it out.


Since when did "hanno" (HAVE) become "are??????? >:[

  • 1153

It didn't. Its just that in english you are 'being right' when in italian or german you 'have right' = having the truth on your side


So irritating that exercise constructors don't seem to be native English speakers. They do not understand synonyms. It is the fundamental weakness of the program. Answers accepted and rejected are often arbitrary or sometimes laughably wrong.


"Actually they make sense" - wrong? I know "hanno senso" is more appropriate, but I believe it should still be accepted. Didn't report it, waiting for comments here.


Mi dispiace, ma in italiano "avere senso" e "avere ragione" sono due cose diverse.


Grazie Mark, non ero sicuro...


In english "right" is a synonym for "correct" in this context" Duolingo gets a -1 here.


You are 100% right, the two are synonyms in English. However, translating this particular phrase "right" is most apropriate. It is the context, as you put it.


Unless there's an idiomatic expression here, i don't buy this translation. Possibly, "They have their reasons."

Learn Italian in just 5 minutes a day. For free.