Don't take my word for it:
Thanks for pointing it out, yet the article seems oddly unscientific to me. The author's language is very antagonizing and self-righteous, and just doesn't match the style needed to write an academic essay. As an example, I don't think the essay should start with calling the language "exploited", "corrupted" and such.(I don't have that writing style myself. Yet I still see a difference) There's also no resources, which makes it very unlike a, say, a scientific article.
I'm not necessarily saying the author is wrong, I'm saying I'm not going to take him at his word, and on an essay that misses so much.