"Ea are picioare frumoase și curate."

Translation: She has beautiful and clean legs.

[MikeBaker874500]

Nobody would say "She has beautiful and clean legs". "She has beautiful clean legs" would be grammatically accurate, although nobody would be likely to say that either.

[Howard]

Correct. The "and" is not necessary in English (though there should be comma).

[JonEnMiljon]

Why can't it be ”picioarele”? I thought body parts always took the definite form after ”has/have”...?

[Lurch_M]

Well, here are some nuances. I'm writing this as a personal style guide, not as an authoritative position on what is correct and what isn't.

She has nice legs = Ea are picioare frumoase.
This is clearly meant as a general statement/impression about a person, so "picioare" is used without any definite article; otherwise it would sound a bit weird to me.

She has clean legs = Ea are picioare curate. / Ea are picioarele curate.
When "picioare" is used, this alludes to the fact that she generally keeps her legs squeaky-clean. But when "picioarele" is used, it somehow hints that her legs are clean at this moment.

[JonEnMiljon]

Mersi! It sounds to make sense! The way Romanian uses the definite/articulate form is different from English and Swedish (my native language) but makes more and more sense the more you get in to it!