"Unaoza"
Translation:It is rotting
18 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
Again, "unaoza" sounds to me like "you rot". Please explain to me, I am lost.
The "u-" prefix can mean the second person singular "you", as you noted.
However, it is also the subject prefix for singular "u/n" and "m/mi" class nouns. As something is rotting, it is not very likely to be a person, so it's assumed to be an object.
Example:
Mti unaoza - The tree is rotting
Unaoza - It is rotting
Jiti (very huge tree) linaoza. [No lesson on this yet]. Miti (trees) inaoza.
Those are the only ways I see to use "linaoza" and "inaoza" when talking about tree(s).
See my reply to the reverse sentence.
Prefixes (and object infixes) for the main non-M/Wa noun classes (relevant class in bold) are:
U- -------M/Mi, U/N
I- --------M/Mi, N/N
Li- -------Ji/Ma
Zi- -------N/N, U/N
Ki- -------Ki/Vi
Vi- -------Ki/Vi
If you come across pa-, ku- or m- they are part of the place classes of nouns. I've still not quite gotten a grasp of those. I think pa- is for specific locations, ku- is general and m- is inside a location, but I might have mixed them up. I don't think the prefix version of these are are really covered in this course.
2995
Strictly speaking, it can mean that, so that translation should be accepted. I don't really want to think too much, though, about a situation where you might need to use it.
Yet it is literally true with some flesh-eating bacteria and something a doctor could say to a patient in such a case.
My dictionary says "-oza" means also to stink, so can this sentence aslo mean "you stink?"
- 1388
Yes metaphorically it would depend on context but if you want to say "you stink", that would be "unanuka"
- 618
why is it "unaoza" and not "inaoza"? Some frases earlier, there was "embe linaoza" ... one of these should be wrong, no?
