"Eine Einführung in ihre Ergebnisse und Probleme."
Translation:An introduction into her results and problems.
21 Comments
What is this supposed to mean? Even as a paper heading, this makes zero sense in English. Would it make sense to a German speaker?
1002
Science historian? Professor announcing the review an advanced student is about to make of her work?
The "Into" bit really throws us native English speakers off. You can be introduced into a group or an environment but not results and problems? It's a bit like introducing someone into your ex; it implies something I'm pretty sure no-one involved actually wants.
- 188
An Introduction to her Results and Problems would sound better, though still odd.
Shouldn't this be "her" or "their," as "ihre" is not capitalized? Or am I missing something?
I have a question just out of curiosity. Have there been any attempts thoughout the history of the German language to introduce separate words for "sie" (she), "sie" (they) and "Sie" (you)?
Have there been any attempts thoughout the history of the German language to introduce separate words for "sie" (she), "sie" (they) and "Sie" (you)?
No, this is really only a problem for learners, not for native speakers. In fact, there used to be several different forms in Old High German. "siu" meant "she" and "they" (neuter), "sie" meant "they" (masculine), and "sio" meant "they (feminine), but they ended up being assimilated phonetically.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sie#Etymology_1_2
If you want to avoid confusion, you can use demonstrative pronouns instead of personal pronouns. That's what many native speakers do in colloquial speech anyway. Just note that this is considered rude when the people you're talking about are present.
Er hat ein Buch - Der hat ein Buch
Sie hat ein Buch - Die hat ein Buch
Sie haben ein Buch - Die haben ein Buch
Since there's no demonstrative formal you, "die haben" can only mean "they have".
This is, in my opinion, the weirdest sentence I've ever seen in Duo, and that says a lot.
See Vabelies explanation above. I have heard something like this quite often.
I think "into" is completely wrong. "To" would be correct if it was an intoduction of a book or something, but at a conference the chairman would say "an introduction of her results.....".
For me, the idea makes sense (as a researcher), but it is not a complete sentence in English. For example, if a person were going to give a talk on her research, someone might ask, "What is she going to talk about?" A response might be, "She will give an introduction to (maybe into if a casual conversation?) her results and problems." In this case "problems" might be difficulty completing the research or it could mean possible error with her results.
Eine Einführung in ihre Ergebnisse und Probleme
Why the form remains as Nominative after "in" here, I thought it should be dative? anyone?
Thanks for the prompt answer. I see, it belongs to the "unbestimmtem Artikel" group. Thanks
