Translation:I wear a black skirt.
We use 'はく' to put under body.(←Please teach me, correct English. )
スカート (skirt) を はきます。
くつ (shoes) を はきます。
The correct way to put it is "to wear below your waist". But thanks for the explanation!
Ohhhh, thanks! Is that why it is called a "hakama"? And similarly "gi" for like a karate or judo top?
There is no difference between singular and plural form of Skirt in japanese. So both are allowed while translating into english. Please fix, because I texted Skirt, and the computer told me that was wrong, and the right was Skirts.
The issue might be that you have answered as "I wear skirt" instead of "I wear a skirt". It accepts both "I wear a skirt" or "I wear skirts"
Please correct me if I'm wrong
”I wear black skirts" can refer to habitual action, as in "I wear black skirts every day". Presumably it's only one skirt at a time, but the speaker has multiple black skirts that they wear. Using the singular would imply to me that the speaker only has the one black skirt that they wear on occasion (while if you wanted to describe what they have on at that very moment the progressive would be more natural, "I'm wearing a black skirt")
Given that Japanese doesn't always use personal pronouns (even though, unlike say Italian, the verbs don't show person distinctions), "SHE wears (or "is wearing") a black skirt" should be accepted here.
She wears a black skirt - yes, this should be accepted. (If not, report it!)
She is wearing a black skirt - no, that is present progressive, which is different from the present/future (as used in the Japanese sentence).
(It is はく, not はきる) As for the difference, 着る is for clothing that is hung from the shoulders, such as jackets, Tshirts and also full body outfits. 履く is for clothing that is like pulled up above from below, e.g. pants and skirts and shoes.
They said はきる was when you're wearing on your body, however i do not know why because i was taught that 着る means to wear on your body too.
not really sure. but, do " I wear black coat " and " I wear a black coat " are really different ?
Yes. You need an article ("a" or "the") before the singular noun in English.
Using "a" and "the" are imcredibly important to English speakers. They are adjectives that specify what the noun is. If you say, "i wear a black coat" then it means that you could be wearing ANY black coat. However, if you say, "i am wearing the black coat" then it means that there is one, out of all of the black coats, that you wear specifically. It is a bit of a bad explanation however, because in that example it would be better to use, "i am wearing that black coat" which would mean you're talking about a coat across the room you are going to wear in the future continuum tense. If you say, "i am wearing this black coat" then that coat is with you, you may be already wearing it or not. Who knows. Back to the original question, if you only say, "i wear black coat" or "i am wearing black coat", we will still understand what you are trying to tell us, but it really important to learn eventually. Not to mention, not using them makes you sound not very fluent. Most english speakers are very forgiving about those learning our language and won't sweat it. Whereas, many english speakers dont overemphasize the importantance either because many languages simply dont have them the same way we do. Spanish does to an extent, but isnt as much. I hope this helps and i encourage you to keep learning:)
"kiru" is just the plain version of "kimasu", or the other way around, "kimasu" is the polite version of "kiru", they both mean to wear somthing on your upper body, like a shirt or jacket. "hakimasu", as well as its plain version "haku", mean to wear something below your waist, such as pants or shoes.
No. That's only if you're describing an ongoing/present action; it's not necessary if you are simply describing what he wears on a daily basis, for example.
In English there is a big difference between "I'm wearing a skirt" and "I wear a skirt". There isn't in my mother tongue. In this example Duo accepts both answers. Does that mean there is no difference in Japanese or should the て＋います form be preferred when saying "I'm wearing sth" ?
Japanese doesn't differentiate between singular and plural nouns, so it is ambiguous unless there is a number with it
Gee, clothing has a lot of issues when accepting answers. Just had to share my frustration.