25 Comments
Ugh, I put "didn't know" instead of don't know, forgetting that the past tense of saber is irregular, i.e: supimos.
- 16
- 2
- 2
Yes,me too! I know it in my head but I type out present tense because I am so use to it. I am getting a little bit better, tho
- 20
- 19
- 17
- 16
- 16
- 6
- 2
"Lo" is a direct-object pronoun, i.e. the receiver of the action. Because the thing is question is doing the occurring, you would need a subject pronoun; however, the subject pronoun for inanimate objects is often omitted in Spanish, leading to the phrase as it is written.
- 12
- 11
- 5
- 4
- 2
so basically "cuando lo ocurrió" is correct but colloquially 'lo' would be omitted?
- 22
- 20
- 19
- 19
- 18
- 12
- 7
- 2
- 2
"Cuando lo ocurrió" isn't correct, because "lo" can't be "it" as the subject of a verb. In my non-native speaker opinion, either "cuando esto ocurrió" or "cuando eso ocurrió" (when this or that happened) would be correct, and either could be shortened to "cuando ocurrió."
- 11
- 6
- 2
I'm native spaker and the alternative ways to say this sentence are:
No sabemos exactamente cuando ocurrió eso
No sabemos exactamente cuando ocurrió esto
generally you use "esto" when the action just happen, and "eso" when the action has happened a time ago.
sorry for my english.
- 16
- 14
- 9
Shouldn't it be "cuándo", since this is an indirect question? I am having trouble working out when to use the accents...
- 20
- 19
- 17
- 16
- 16
- 6
- 2
I believe it should be "cuándo" as well. It serves as a pronoun in this sentence. Otherwise, it would mean something like "we do not exactly know after it happened."
I typed it in exactly with the exception of the accents. suddenly it isn't forgiving if this?
- 21
- 6
- 4
- 3
- 2
Is it normal in el mundo hispanohablante to combine the end and start of adjacent words with the same syllables, such as "cuando occurio" ?
