"タクシーにのります。"

Translation:I ride taxis.

June 9, 2017

72 Comments


https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Stella_solitas

タクシーに乗ります。

July 12, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/FonzieSquirrel

Kanji newbie here...

Why did we replace the ever so convinient の with the web of strokes that is 乗?

What ever drove the Japanese to keep on writing half the language in the same manner while they found a way to write exactly what you pronounce?

July 12, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/CaleGibbard

One reason is that even if you don't know a word, if you know the kanji used to write it, you can often tell what it means. It's like how in English knowing the Latin or Greek roots of a word can be helpful in trying to guess what it means. I often run into words in Japanese which I don't know how to pronounce but I know correctly what they mean because they're written with kanji.

The main reason though is visual clarity of meaning. Once you recognize kanji, they stand out from the kana and help you know what's being said more quickly without having to pronounce everything. Part of the trouble here is just that Japanese tends not to use spaces between words, so without kanji it can be hard to tell at a glance where words begin and end, but also there are a fair number of homophones - I sometimes think Japanese even outdoes English when it comes to puns.

Kanji help to clarify meanings while adding visual contrast to make sentences easier to parse. It might not be the best system, but it does have its advantages.

It's also worth noting that Chinese characters are built out of parts that get reused, so learning them is not much worse than learning how to spell words in English.

July 15, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/N1chope

I'd just like to add that in my opinion learning kanji is definitely easier than learning English spelling: while you have to learn about the 2000 most used kanji in Japanese, English pronunciation is so irregular that in order to know their correct spelling you need to learn every single word, regardless of their grammatical category or roots

September 21, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/kairu260485

English is made out of a mash of several disparate languages, it makes for annoying spelling (even native speakers mess up spelling most of the time). Japanese is nice because it is spelled exactly as it sounds

October 2, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Estel785882

Another factor in that is that Japanese had a spelling reform in the mid-1900s. Before that, it used a historically-based spelling that wasn't nearly as close to how it sounds: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_kana_orthography

English spelling has a lot of history in it, and hasn't been reformed, which is a major factor in why it's so far from pronunciation.

November 22, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Christian_Leo

Godan verb with ru ending, intransitive verb: To get on (train, plane, bus, ship, etc.); To get in; To board; To take; To embark​.

August 9, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Cryopneuma

So, would a more accurate translation to this be "I am boarding a taxi?"

August 13, 2019

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/FonzieSquirrel

Ah yes, I can see that with the lack of spaces and not being able to indicate meaning as well on text as when you speak Japanese... I can see how writing Kanji can get a tad important here and there.

And I did know they're built out of radicals!

July 16, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Y.R.H.

you did a great explaination before, so could you please explain why in this sentence there is no wa after the ni?

April 26, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/David553624

the other comments are not entirely wrong but here's a more straightforward answer: typically you add は after に if the verb (in this case "ride") is in its negative form. (e.g. "I do not ride taxis" - "タクシーにはのりません") You usually don't add は after に otherwise, unless you specifically want to mark "takushii ni" as the topic, although I can't think of a case where it would make sense to do so.

Duolingo doesn't really do a good job of explaining verb negation or just particles in general. Here's a pretty good explanation of how you can use particles in negative form: https://www.learn-japanese-adventure.com/japanese-particles-change.html

June 30, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/asterlea

は marks the topic of the sentence, which in this case is omitted. The full sentence would be something like [わたしは]タクシーにのります, "[I] ride a taxi", but in Japanese it's common to drop the [わたしは] as it's usually clear who you're talking about from the context.

This is different from the other sentence that I'm guessing you're thinking of, タクシーにはのりません, where the topic is the taxi. It's kind of confusing because it's a distinction we don't really make in English. In the first one it's like saying "Talking about myself, I ride taxis", while the other is "Talking about taxis, I don't ride them". I recommend reading about the use of は and が as it tends to be a concept that usually takes learners awhile to really understand. Here's a site that I think does a decent job of explaining it: https://8020japanese.com/wa-vs-ga/

June 16, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

Having は after に is unnecessary unless for some reason you particularly wanted to draw attention to and emphasise the way you travelled ie. in this case 'by taxi'.

June 17, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/David553624

If I wanted to say "by taxi," shouldn't I use で instead? If I wanted to say "I ride by taxi" I would write ”タクシーでのります”, though to be fair this statement doesn't really make sense.

A better example: "I go to work by taxi" would be "タクシーで仕事に行きます”

June 30, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

David553624, 乗りますmeans to get in/on, board, ride in/on etc so に is always used to show that you are getting in or on some kind of vehicle. You would never use で with 乗ります.

November 22, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

Kanji came before kana so the Japanese didn't invent more complicated characters - it was the other way around. Kanji are chinese characters that the Japanese borrowed and changed for their own use. From Kanji they developed the more simplified hiragana and katakana (commonly referred to as simply kana) which have phonetic value only - ie. they only convey how something is pronounced like the English alphabet, and nothing else. Kanji however convey meaning AND sound and because they are borrowed from Chinese they have different "readings" or different ways of reading/pronouncing them - some kept or changed slightly from the Chinese pronunciation. Sometimes Japanese words can be written entirely in Kanji and other times they are written partially in Kanji and partially in kana. Because Kanji convey meaning as well as how to pronounce them they can be helpful especially if you don't know a certain Kanji. For example say a word is made up of two or more kanji you might not know one kanji but you might know the others and may be able to guess the meaning that way. Kanji can either be one character or two or more characters making up one character, so if you don't know a Kanji and it is made up of multiple kanji you might be able to recognise one or more of the characters that form that one Kanji and guess the meaning that way. I have a great Kanji book with several different ways to look them up - pronounciation in romaji, number of strokes, by radical - by the number of strokes of radicals. I think Kanji is fascinating.

July 14, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/FonzieSquirrel

I know the Chinese brought their reading and writing system over to Japan (kinda by force, but what do you want with historical warfare?) and that the Japanese made their own Hiragana based off the Chinese characters many years later. If I'm not mistaken Katakana were made for the paper press.

The part that I was more confused about is that, if they found a more convenient way later on, why would they keep on using Kanji. I think GaleGibbard explained it nicely, though!

July 16, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/megan.turl

The Chinese didn't bring the kana system over by force. Japanese scholars brought it over...

August 29, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

They kept both because kana (hiragana and katakana) only convey how the words sound whilst, kanji conveys sound AND meaning, and one can sometimes use the meaning of individual kanji to deduce the meaning of an unknown word. And it's beautiful.

July 18, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Stella_solitas

Every Kanji character has its own meaning and pronunciation. If you replace 乗 with の, you only preserve pronunciation part of the whole information. It might cause confusion with some other words with same の pronunciation (e.g., 載る). Thus, in my honest opinion, it can be an elegant way to represent the origin and delicate nuance of a vocabulary within itself in a simple manner. (Disclaimer: I'm not Japanese, so I'm not sure whether they actually feel it in this way.)

July 12, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/denimbluesky

I think you've recognized an integral aspect of 日本 culture, particularly language & art as represented in 漢字。 There is also something quintessentially japanese in their appreciation of the complexity of using 4 writing systems. Inscrutable indeed.

January 13, 2019

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Koekje17

Because if I say "はやいですね" it has meaning: "it is fast, isn't it" and "it is early, isn't it" but if I write "速いですね" it can only mean "it is fast, isn't it" and if I write "早いですね" it can only mean "It's early isn't it". It actually reads much faster, because the many strokes makes it more distinguishable, but both is said "はやいですね". Japanese is very context-dependant. When they say it, you can see the context clearly because if it is late and you are in a fast car it doesn't make sense to say "It's early" so then it only has one meaning. But in text it gives context directly thanks to the kanji. I hope this answer helps.

April 10, 2019

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/saliast

I ride a taxi is broken english. I ride in a taxi.. I take a taxi, yeah.. But ride a taxi? Is that like riding a horse?

July 8, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/saliast

Nori translated to me as 'get on'... I get on a taxi? Get in a taxi? Whats with this ride business?

July 8, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/CaleGibbard

It's "to get on/in" but it's also used in the same way as "to take" is used in English when it comes to transportation.

July 15, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/TheKingNerd

it told me that the correct solution is "i'm going to take taxi"..... fp

November 9, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/willpac828

What is the function of the "ni" particle in this particular instance? Is it indicating location or something else?

March 23, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

It is indicating the vehicle that you are getting in/on.boarding. Also certain verbs as a rule often work specifically with certain particles. に is that for 乗ります.

March 24, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/willpac828

Thanks for the explanation!

March 30, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/UTFong

Why ni instead of wo?

April 23, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

ni - in or on - used with noru to mean to get in or on (or ride in or on) a vehicle.

April 25, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/arienrhod1

There is an extra space in the english answer, and it's correcting me even if my answer is exactly the same, minus extra space (it accepts the answer though)

June 10, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Billy204269

Still an exta space, but it accepts it now.

July 20, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/NicoleMisra

Why are they not accepting my use of 乗る kanji as correct?

December 29, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/kestral11

What about "I get into the taxi"?

July 2, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

My answer was accepted - I put "I take a taxi".

July 9, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/StefanJobl

Yet i get a taxi wasnt

October 15, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Scott827167

Could be any pronoun, or none at all... this is not always I

July 18, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Christine816452

I would get into a taxi, not get in a taxi - and I would ride in a taxi, not ride a taxi. There is not an exact English equivalent, so the range of acceptable answers should be broadened.

October 14, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AJWentworth

I agree that "I ride a taxi" is not natural sounding English, and gives the impression of riding on top of the taxi roof. Possibly the reason we "ride" a train or bus, but not a taxi, is that, traditionally, you had to step up to get on a bus or train, so you were in a sense mounting it like a horse. "I use a taxi" was not accepted as an answer to this question.

November 11, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/HoroTanuki

"I ride the cab" wasn't accepted...

November 23, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Hedwigechouette

" i get a ride in a taxi" was disallowed but I think it's ok

December 14, 2017

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/kelskye

Would this best translate to "I take taxis" as a general statement about transport habits, or is it about a particular taxi ride as in "I took a taxi" / "I'm taking a taxi" / "I will take a taxi"?

The broken English of "I take a taxi" is unhelpful.

June 7, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Vjerrr

I ridw taxis? Wierd English!

July 12, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

It does sound odd - I think Duo is attempting to convey the meaning of のります better in English but it's not working out so well.

July 12, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/SakuraChan716788

Someone can help french people ? What's difference between take and ride .. it isn't the same thing ?

August 7, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/ducthotran2010

Why "I take taxi" is wrong. Sb help me please.

August 26, 2018

https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Estel785882

It's not a good English sentence. In English you need either "a taxi" or "the taxi". (Or you could make it plural and say "taxis".)

November 22, 2018

[deactivated user]

    i mean taxi

    August 28, 2018

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

    I like taxis? But this sentence doesn't say anything about liking taxis.

    November 22, 2018

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/duolingo664322

    The pioneers used to ride these babies for miles!

    August 31, 2018

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Dang800231

    I drive taxi should be accpeted.

    October 25, 2018

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

    No, it should not. English requires a or the before taxi. Also the Japanese is not saying drive but ride in or take a taxi so your answer should not be accepted at all.

    October 25, 2018

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/Wandering_Rogue

    In England you would never say that we "ride" a car or taxi or anything but an animal or a bike. We "get", "call", "drive" or "use" them... This sentence confused me and made no sense at first

    October 25, 2018

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

    Translation from any language is tricky - Japanese is tricky I think because the Japanese conveys more than the English equivalent is able to - for instance 乗る can mean to get in/on, board, ride, ride in/on etc. This one Japanese verb conveys all these possible meanings at once but the English rough equivalent " I take a taxi" is comparatively flat. It just can't convey all that the Japanese does. So it's hard to show that you understand what the original Japanese is saying without sacrificing natural sounding English. I think this is why Duo has so many odd sounding English translations - I suspect this is not just the case for Japanese either, although I will say that because Japanese is able to convey multiple meanings at once it does seem to happen more in Japanese lessons.

    Btw - うんてん する means to drive.

    October 27, 2018

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/9cne1

    Ride taxis ???

    November 20, 2018

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/John672076

    Why is " I take the Taxi" is not accepted as an answer?

    February 20, 2019

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/denimbluesky

    It's uncommon to say take the taxi since that's a specific taxi But it's not incorrect it just depends on the context

    February 20, 2019

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/KateFung3

    i thought it was "i will ride a taxi" not "I ride taxis" i just think its more grammatically correct but k

    March 11, 2019

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

    Both of these sound like you are riding on top of a taxi like a horse.

    March 11, 2019

    https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AntonioBar555159

    タクシーに乗りますmeans "I take a taxi" ffs, it definitely doesn't mean "I ride taxis"

    August 31, 2019

    [deactivated user]

      i like taxu should be accepted

      August 28, 2018

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/IngvildHau2

      The tasks where you have to write the senences in english almost always fails, as there is only one corrects answer, even tho there are many corrects ways to write the sentence. "I am riding a taxi" as my answer, vs. "I am riding in a taxi" as the correct one. Noone is riding IN a taxi tho.

      June 9, 2017

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/FonzieSquirrel

      Also, flag anomalies. This way the DuoLingo team can improve the accepted answers for everyone else to come!

      July 12, 2017

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

      The problem is that Duo is attempting to include all the nuances of meaning conveyed in the Japanese in their English translation or at least to retain some of the meaning from the original Japanese in the English translation but that often results in rather unnatural or odd sounding English or what I like to call "translationese". Personally I think a translation that conveys the same feeling/essence/meaning of the original Japanese but in natural sounding English (or whatever language you're translating to) can show that while you clearly understand what the Japanese is trying to say you're not gonna sacrifice natural or grammatical English to convey that, but if you can do that AND somehow have a nod to the Japanese without it sounding odd then even better :D

      October 27, 2018

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/XRavishX

      Keep the sentence simple and intuitive and you shouldn't fail. Literaly, the sentence translates close to "I ride in a taxi" or maybe even "I get a ride in a taxi." But, a native English speaker wouldn't speak like that. Writing "I ride a taxi" would be a more appropriate translation and shouldn't fail.

      June 16, 2017

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/denimbluesky

      I don't think I ride a taxi is more natural or appropriate than I ride in a taxi Take a taxi is most common

      February 20, 2019

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/AnaLydiate

      I ride a taxi sounds like you're riding on top of the taxi line it's a house or something. Consequently I ride in a taxi technically sounds more logical but you're right - neither sound like natural English or is in common use.

      February 20, 2019

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/CasperDisaster

      Should count "I boarded the taxi."

      June 29, 2017

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/RobbPorter

      You don't really board a car.

      September 29, 2017

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/FonzieSquirrel

      Not really no, the Japanese sentence specifically states being in the taxi at this specific moment right now.

      July 12, 2017

      https://www.duolingo.com/profile/butsuri

      That isn't true. 乗る is "to get on; to ride in; to board; to mount; to get up on". And it's as likely to refer to the future as the present.

      "Boarded" would be wrong because it's not past tense, but I think "board" or "will board" should be accepted, even if it's a slightly unidiomatic way of saying it in English.

      December 4, 2017
      Learn Japanese in just 5 minutes a day. For free.