"Ea mănâncă pâinea și mărul."

Translation: She eats the loaf of bread and the apple.

[SFFCorgi]

I protest. If the word for bread by itself is 'a LOAF of bread', then this should translate similarly as an option. 'She eats the loaf of bread and the apple.' Maybe it's a small loaf! Maybe she's really hungry! Maybe she only eats part of it, but who wants a loaf that's been chewed on already?

[deactivated user]

You are right! I don't like the way they translated " a loaf of bread= pâine ( or was it pâinea?)"...anyway, it is confusing ...it should be simple "bread= pâine" or " the bread= pâinea"

[Stan_Kpop1]

yees:) i am romanian and bread = paine, a loaf of bread = bucata de paine... bad translation here

[lojbanlorxu]

Man this sentence sure is a mouthful when you're new...

[DavidRomanH]

I had the confusing transaction option of 'it' instead of 'she'. I understand that there is no 'it' in Romanian, but this felt a little thrown in as I hadn't been faced with an 'it' when looking at the prepositions earlier.

[zappycat818]

i still dont understand when to use the u, a, etc. at the end

[eduardmarin1]

this is wrong, it doesn't have to be loaf of bread, it can just be bread because paine means bread. Loaf of bread in Romanian is o bucata/felie de paine. Literally translating to a piece/slice of bread

[Simon160053]

This one gave me "It eats the bread and the apple." as the correct solution. while the forum thread here clearly states "She" and the latter is definetely correct.

[LauraSotom13]

WRONG!

[Lng52-._]

Could you also say, "Ea mănâncă pâinea de pâine și mărul"?

[deactivated user]

No you can not say that " she eats the bread of bread and the apple" ...She eats the bread= ea mănâncă pâinea.