Translation:My blouse is nowhere to be seen.
There seems to be some confusion over how も is used here. The best way I've seen someone describe it (on Japanese stack exchange) is to think of it as expressing completeness or totality. When added to any indefinite demonstrative like どこ, どれ, だれ, etc. it can mean all or nothing depending on whether the sentence is positive or negative.
At this place, all of the possible whos exist.
Everyone is here.
At this place, all of the possible whos do not exist.
There is no one here.
Thinking about も as meaning completeness also makes sense for the way we have learnt to use it to mean "also" because adding extra information ("and also") makes your meaning more complete.
With どこ there is a reason for having the に there as well i.e どこにも but I can't remember a good explanation off the top of my head.
For a more in depth explanation, including some exceptions: http://www.guidetojapanese.org/learn/complete/questionwords
Thinking in terms of inclusion is a good method.
As there is no direct equivalent in English, we need to have several cases:
A. Affirmative sentence : as well
Tanaka is here as well
B. Negative sentence : either
Tanaka is not here either.
We can find that the concept of both cases is the same; only they are not usually expressed in English in the same way.
Incorporating the concept of interrogative pronouns:
A. Affirmative sentence : ~ever as well
Whoever is here as well (Everbody is here)
B. Negative sentence : any~ either
Anybody is not here either (Nobody is here)
Certainly this is for understanding the concept of も. It is not an attempt to demonstrate good English or translation.
Moreover when we use も, が and は are not needed.
How I understand it, the use of に is when the place is described in combination with either of the existence verbs, ある or いる. The place being described is "here."
There is food.
There is food here.
There is no food here.
There is no food anywhere (here).
In relation to the above translation regarding the blouse, ここ is present, meaning に must also be as well. The word here must be present in this sense because the place is being described. There is no food in this area, and that means も must be attributed to ここ.
As Keith mentioned, も cannot replace に or で. Only は and が. That's why に remains alongside it.
Well... my Japanese isn't great but here's what I've come up with/how I remember:
The subject (in this case my blouse) is in a negative state of being in an unknown location- that is it say it's location is not known to be in any of the unspecified locations it should be.
That's probably not helpful and likely wrong but ultimately どこにもない is a common phrase that translates as nowhere (to be found).
Apologies to any native speakers I have offended with my butchered understanding.
Adding mo after -dokoni- changes it to "nowehere to". Nanimo = nothing. Daremo = nobody. Dokomo = nowehere.
If you quote something, then quote it correctly please. "When you are forming sentences with the above 3 words, some of them require particle while some do not. And all these 3 words have to be used together with the negative form sentences." Question word + も + Negative form The "negative form" here is "nai".
Another way to say it: Answer: いいえ、[わたしは] なにも のみません. No, I nothing drink. -But the "masen" is still there! If they didn't use a verb, but いいえ、なにもない、ありがと, then "nai" would be enough.
わたしのブラウスが (my blouse) どこにも (anywhere) ないです (isn't)。
"My blouse anywhere isn't" becomes "my blouse isn't anywhere", which becomes "my blouse is nowhere to be seen". A bit of a stretch, but it's necessary to avoid the awkward literal translation, since no native English speaker would say "my blouse isn't anywhere".
A point of confusion may lie in どこにも. Do now that the below explanation is just my speculation. どこ means "where". Adding the も particle gives it the sense of inclusion, making it mean "anywhere". The に particle tells us that "anywhere" is the location, but it seems that に always goes before も, so we get どこにも instead of どこもに.