"I always eat one slice of bread for breakfast."
1) In addition to the word bank, the web version of DuoLingo lets users input answers with their keyboard.
2) In Japanese (and many other languages), there are several ways to express a given idea.
3) From what I can tell, DuoLingo looks at your answer, tries to figure out what you were trying to say, and suggests a correction using a similar structure. In other words, DuoLingo does not always suggest the same correction.
Whether or not you are using the supplied word bank or typing your answer with your keyboard, I think DuoLingo is designed to be 'smart' this way. I think this leads to situations where DuoLingo can suggest a correction which does not include words from the word bank.
My best guess: DuoLingo thought you were trying to use a different sentence structure, and the closest correction it could think of was one that included の, even thought の is not in the word bank.
As an experiment, you could try to provide the following incorrect answer next time (which does not include の) and see the suggested correction
(I removed the すfrom the end of the sentence so it will be wrong)
I think if Duo wants a specific answer, which they do, then they should give you all the correct possible words and particles in the word bank to create that answer. If the correct answer includes の then の should be in the word bank. Of course, alternative translations are accepted as well, when approved by Duo, but at the moment the main correct translation answer Duo is looking for is 朝ご飯はいつもパンを一枚食べます
Absolutely incorrect, and i have no idea why you would say such when you clearly have no understanding of the language.
Definition of time does not have to come first, nor does it. "ボートの操作者は禁煙の表示にも関わらず、堂々といつも吸っていた" "Despite all the no-smoking signs, the boat operator was brazenly smoking all the time"
"彼女は時間がないといつも不平たらたらだ" "She keeps moaning that she has no time"
Even so, the answer it gives on this discussion page for the question is "あさごはんはいつもパンを一まい食べます。 " with the itsumo in the middle and not including the no that isn't even in the word bank. I've heard putting time in front usually sounds the best native speaking but there isn't really anything grammatically wrong by putting it somewhere else. It's more the most important words come first, so starting with いつも simply puts more stress on 'always'
I wanted to use itsumo before bread originally , but then I thought it Japanese had that language rules so that that it has to come before asagohan.
Because you also say every week Monday, instead of every Monday.
Funny thar I was incorrect but it still fits better into the way Japanese talk, if what you say is true.
I don't think so. While it would probably not grammatically correct. I assume your sentence would mean something like if I have a slice of bread I'm gonna eat it.
But probably better wait for someone with better knowledge of Japanese. That person will give you a better answer
It wouldn't even be one bread, you'd eat one whole concept of bread, as in, you'd eat so much the entire human understanding of bread would disappear overnight.
That's why it's not accepted.
Jokes aside, what you want is either パンを1つ which is in common speech understood as "1 slice of bread", but in literal terms is "1 bread". The actual answer calls for パンを1枚
You are correct, except that 杯 is a counter for cups, ships and octopi(and squids). I believe 瓶 is acceptable for bottles, but 本 is the correct one http://jisho.org/search/%E4%B8%80%E7%93%B6%20%23sentences
You're going to sound very odd but the bartender will probably get your meaning. You're better off using the universal counter 一つ（ひとつ）rather than いち but for glasses or bottles of beer this is still going to sound odd. You could also simply say ビールをください and hold up one finger.
How come 「朝ご飯 は パン を 一枚 いつも 食べます」 isn't acceptable? In many other sentences, the time and the counter come after the topic and object, usually kind of modifying the verb (i think like "As for breakfast, bread (i) one-of-always-eat"). Why does the time descriptor have to come before 「パン」? And for that matter, could the counter join the time word before the object as well?
in your structure, いつも should come first as「朝ご飯は、パンをいつも1枚食べる」I'm not sure if Duo accepts it though.
Also, いつも is not really being placed before パン, is being placed at the start of the sentence and then being moved to the right because there is a topic marker present, this is in order to make the sentence sounds more natural. You could however say「いつも、朝ご飯はパンを1枚食べる」 and it would sounds just fine to a native.
Not a bug. 人 is the kanji meaning “person.” It is pronounced several different ways depending on context. When used by itself for the literal meaning “person” it is usually pronounced ひと (hito).
The concept of “one” or a single thing or object can be expressed in a number of ways in Japanese. In the case of counting objects like slices of toast, you may have been looking for the generic counter word: 一つ, pronounced ひとつ (hitotsu), meaning “one thing or object.”
枚【まい】 works to count flat objects: paper, pizza, clothes. For a loaf you would use 斤【きん】.. and this one is used for things that have weight and are sold in pieces like a loaf of bread, a sack of sugar or beans, also sponge cakes, but most of the time is only used for white bread, because there are other counter for those other things.
Hi guys. I wrote "朝ご飯はいつもパン一枚を食べます。" and Duolingo does not accepted this answer. I know that particle を is used to indicate an object of a verb. I searched in some dictionarys in the web and 一枚 it is a noun, not an object. May someone help me? Obs.: Sorry for my bad English. I am on the way.
Hi. Since they are both nouns, you cant put パン and 一枚 next to each other like that without a connector between them. There are two ways you can do this. You can put the を object marker connector between them, in which case the end of the sentence becomes ...パンを一枚食べます。Or you can use the possesive の connector, in which case the correct word order is ...一枚のパンを食べます。And yes, this is kind of confusing and not very logical. But languages aren't always logical in this is the way it is done in Japanese. Happy learning!
ha(not wa) is a difficult one to understand since it has no real equivalent in many other languages. Basically you can understand that は points to the topical stuff toward the right after declaring the subject to the left.
Particles are an extremely important subject to learn. There are a lot of good resources on the web
The particle "wa" is the topic-marking particle. It is written as は in hiragana, but this is an irregular spelling. は is usually read as "ha", but in the case of this particle, it is read as "wa".
A particle always marks whatever comes before it - i.e., to the left of it, if writing from left to right, as we are here. In the case of the topic-marking particle "wa", it marks the topic, so the topic is whatever is to the left of the "wa".
The subject is a different concept altogether. The subject is marked by a different particle, "ga", which is written as が in hiragana. In the sentence at the top of this page, the subject would be "watashi", meaning "I", so "watashi" is what would be marked with "ga", to give you "watashi ga". However, this phrase is actually omitted from this sentence, because the subject is obvious, and the Japanese language has a tendency to omit the subject when it is obvious.
That order would require the particle の (いちまいのパン）, but this would still alter the meaning and create the impression that it is bread packaged in single slices. When you add の after a counter you create a set grouping, i.e 七人の侍 (The Seven Samurai). In the same way 一枚のパン would be 'The one-slice bread'. You want to say, however, that you had one slice from a larger quantity, so you would use the Noun + を + counter form (one slice of the bread).
You've got a わ in there that should be a は topic marker.
Aside from that, attaching a quantifier directly to a noun requires a の between them. There's a more detailed explanation of this in some of the comments above by BJCUAl and butsuri
Not sure that format would be accepted though either since the meaning slightly changes when you connect the counter to the noun that way and I haven't tested it myself
So with the new redesign often the bottom row of boxes in the word bank get covered up by the panel on the bottom of the screen. The boxes haven't changed, they just aren't visible anymore. A fix that tends to work and show the missing boxes is to zoom out on the Duo page (on Windows hold "CTRL" and tap "-" until visible)
It's certainly annoying and the staff have been made aware of it. Haven't heard anything on if/when the issue will be fixed yet though. It's especially frustrating on really long sentences that might have more than one row of words hidden. If zooming out is too difficult to read, using the keyboard is the best alternative since it challenges your memory a bit more anyway.
you can see for yourself in google. Search "朝ご飯で" or any other you want to check.
here is an example「毎日の朝ご飯で脳を活性化」"activate your brain with a daily breakfast"
「朝ご飯を作ります」I will make breakfast
you can also say「 私、朝ご飯は～」「私朝ご飯には～」but those are more colloquial patterns, just take the particles one by one, otherwise, you will get confused.
In this particular exercise, I would write it as「朝ご飯には～」to make it sounds more natural
both have the same meaning, いつも is an adverb changing the verb 食べる, the reason why いつも is placed there is because you cannot place adverbs changing verbs before the topic. Otherwise it (the adverb) would be the first word or it would be just before the verb like the one you made. This sentence in particular is a bit awkward in that regard, it's better to see it as 2 parts 「朝ご飯は」「いつもパンを一枚食べます」
does that imply that you always eat bread, but not necessarily just one slice?
it means you always eat one slice of bread, if you want the other one you need to remove the counter part.
While word order isn't strictly important since particles exist, there are still orders that certainly sound far more natural than others.
"Breakfast" is marked with the topic particle in this sentence and the topic is generally near the beginning of a sentence as it introduces the broader idea of the conversation and then gets more specific.
The way you have 一枚 and 朝ごはん connected also kind of reads like "I always eat bread for one slice of breakfast"
So the translated sentence and the actual sentence say two different things from my understanding.
The Japanese literally translates to: For breakfast i always eat 1 slice of bread. Where the English is: I always eat one slice of bread for breakfast.
The Japanese version states if the person has breakfast, they always have one slice of bread. But the English says that they always have breakfast, and that breakfast is one slice of bread.
Similar but not the same meanings.
"For breakfast, I always eat 1 slice of bread"
"I always eat one slice of bread for breakfast"
Both mean the same thing in English with different emphasis, the speaker is saying that when they have breakfast, they always eat one slice of bread.
the Japanese sentence says the same, you can see it if you translate「いつもパンを食べる」"I always eat bread", the rest is things added to the sentences to make it more specific. 朝ご飯は is the topic and 1枚 is the quantifier that extends the verb.
I think the sentence you are confused about in English is "if I ever eat breakfast, I always eat 1 slice of bread". In Japanese, I believe you use the conditional form of verbs for those kinds of sentences.
You've got too many particles in there
In the main sentence: 朝ご飯はいつもパンを一枚食べます
朝ご飯は - Breakfast (topic)
いつも - always
パンを - Bread (object)
食べます (Eat - verb)
The Bread and the amount of bread can be considered a single noun. "One slice of bread"
Marking "bread" with が (the thing being talked about, the thing doing the action) and "one slice" as an object makes it look like the bread is the thing eating one slice of something,
You can't put a modifier like いつも between the topic (朝ご飯 in this case) and the topic marker は like that. The topic marker は must immediately follow whatever it is marking as the topic. Other than this rule, you do have some flexibility as to where you put the いつも in this sentence. For example, at the very beginning (いつも、朝ご飯は。。。) or after the topic (あさごはんはいつも。。。) are both acceptable grammatically.
I'm interested in the distinction between using に or は or には after 朝ご飯,as TyrantRC先生 touched on earlier? I wanted to use に as I think this was used in other lessons for expressing what food is eaten at a meal? Would you use は if someone asked you what you eat for breakfast (so breakfast is old information), but に if you were responding to a more general question about your diet, or maybe if you're asked about when you'd eat bread?
As I understand it. いつも can go anywhere before the verb that is not in the middle of a clause, but optimally it should go before something that is always.
Your second example means, "I always eat breakfast and have one slice of bread." which is arguably a different meaning.
Your third example would be, "When I have bread for breakfast, I always have one slice."