"Does he sleep with his socks on?"
Translation:Dort-il avec ses chaussettes ?
Only his socks? wink wink
La phrase ne dit pas qu'il porte see chaussettes quand il dort, seulement qu'il a ses chaussettes quand il dort. avoir et porter sont des verbes différents, mails similaires dans ce contexte.
Evidently, French doesn't emphasize where the socks are located as is essential in English.
In English, when when you say "Does he sleep with his socks ON?" (...or pajamas, or hat...), it means he is wearing them. Therefore, you must be explicit. I thought you would have to use "porte-t-il les chausettes quand il dort?" Is that actually wrong?
If he only has the socks with him, as in "il a ses chaussettes", the English sentence would have said, "Does he sleep with his socks?" In English, that does NOT imply wearing the socks. He may simply be holding onto them. A similar sentence would be "Does he sleep with his teddy bear?" (Is it in the bed with him?)
A situation not having to do with clothing would be "Does he sleep with his radio on?" or "Does he sleep with his light on?" In those cases it has to do with electricity. Again, you would not drop the on because that would imply that the radio or the light is in the bed with him. Not so in French, eh? Tricky.
You are incorrect. The lesson asks if he sleeps with his socks on, meaning wearing his socks. It does not ask if he sleeps with his socks somewhere in the bed with him, like one would sleep with a stuffed animal. Porter should be in the correct answer. This should be reported.
First, because contrary to English, it's not possible to put a preposition at the end of a sentence.
Second, we don't translate the on in the English expression in English a piece of clothing on . We just say ses chaussettes.
Is it assumed he's not sleeping with socks in bed with him? I thought "porte" should be in there to indicate "wearing"?
Use son if it is a masculine, singular item that he is wearing, eg. son chapeau. Use ses to agree with socks, which is feminine and plural. And, just for completeness, use sa if he sleeps with one sock on.
Dort il avec ses chaussettes ? I can think that he is sleeping and he is holding socks in his hands?
Qu'est-ce qu'il dort avec ses chaussettes? Can someone please explain why this is wrong? Thanks in advance!
"Est-ce qu'il dort avec ses chaussettes?" is correct. "Que" in the beginning is not needed, in that case it would be translated "What does he sleep..." that doesn't have sense.
Est-ce que il dort avec ses chausettes is what I entered and it was wrong.. I thought it would be right but marked with a flag as the qu'il wasn't captured. Is the sentence not correct usage?
Is "Est-ce qu'il dort en portant ses chaussettes ? "a possible translation ?
Lucy, in American English when we say he sleeps with socks does not mean that he sleeps wearing his socks. It could mean that he's sleeping and his socks are somewhere in the bed with him, or he is sleeping and his socks may be in his hands, hands as someone said. In American English to be clear we would say, he sleeps wearing his socks, or he sleeps with his socks on, or he sleeps in his socks. Simply saying that he sleeps with his socks does not mean much of anything.