"Garam, who is there?"

Translation: 가람 씨, 누가 거기에 있어요?

[dipagssi]

Why is "가람 씨, 거기에 누구예요?" wrong? Can someone explain? Thanks.

[bisnagunha]

I think it has to have the "is"

[fornalina]

Both 가람 and 가람 씨 should be accepted as a correct answer since 씨 is practically untranslatable.

[fornalina]

Moreover 가람 씨 거기에 누가 있어요 sounds more natural

[AzimAsjadZ]

I agree with you

[mxriii]

I probably would have said 'Mr garam' in that case

[blzs92]

Can I say in this case ? 가람 거기에 누구예요 ?

[Ingrid999653]

whats the difference with 누가 and 누구가 how will i know when to use what

[Yoshi.5]

누가 is just the contracted version of 누구가. You can use both at any time. It's kind of like Do not - Don't

[KrishPan]

when garam is destroying you and his gf texts

[EltYDk]

I just feel like you should be able to say there before who. That's how we use it casually in my family. Why is it a typo?