"고양이는 음식이 아닙니다."
Translation:A cat is not food.
50 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
Yes, korean grammar is different than english grammar, they have it backwards from us
It's not "backwards" it's subject object verb. And saying that Korean is "backwards" is participating in English hegemony.
Keep in mind that the verb "is" is like an equal sign. In English the subject is placed before the verb and a predicate nominative that refers to the subject is placed after the verb. In some languages, both nouns may be considered as if they were both subjects. In Chinese, one of these will be marked as the topic.
Subject(subject or topic marker) Predicate Nominative(subject or topic marker) (negative,if needed) verb
고양이는 음식이 아닙니다.
So the word order is as if they wrote: cat food not is
Yet there is an extra syllable attached to the end of each noun that marks which is the topic and which is just another subject (or in my mind I think of it as equal to the subject). Also, keep in mind that in another sentence you may find that an object is marked as the topic.
고양이 (cat) 는 (topic marker for words that end in a vowel)
음식 (food) 이 (subject marker for words that end in a consonant)
아 (this is what is negating the verb)
It is from 아니 which means "no".
닙니다 (this is the verb, here "is"; remember the verb doesn't conjugate as it does in English, so it looks the same for "am" and "are")
Here is the link for the skill set Basics1 which explains in more detail this Korean grammar, just scroll down to read the tips and notes with an internet browser.) https://www.duolingo.com/skill/ko/basics-1
Now you would click on the skill and click on the lightbulb icon for the tips and notes.
Serious question here lol. Why do we put 는 after cats, and 이 after food? I am not quite understanding the grammar here yet sorry
는 is the subject of sentences and 이 is topic marker of sentences. Cats is the subject and food is the topic. 이 go to 90dayKorean to learn more, I find they very helpful! :D (Thats how I was tought, i think I may have it backwards- sorry if I do, if i do just switch it around)
cat was the topic and the subject was food, food 음식 ends with a consonant so 이 is added to finish it... hope that made sense
The plural marker may or may not be used. The general statement "Cats are not food." is equivalent to "A cat is not food." It all depends on whether they are trying to teach you the plural marker. When you do see that plural marker, you won't have the choice any more to translate it as singular.
입니다 is a state of being. So "am/is" in the most formal way. You would speak like this to someone you want to be very polite to. You will learn the 이에요/예요 version later.
Korean has two words meaning "to be"
이다 means to be, in the sense as being the same thing as. It's opposite is 안다, meaning "to not be" in the same sense.
없다 means to be, in the sense of existing, or in describing how or where it exists. It's opposite is 없다, meaning "to not be" in the same sense.
So, 안입니다 means "is not" or "is not the same thing as".
Scroll down at this link past the lessons for the tips and notes on an internet browser https://www.duolingo.com/skill/ko/basics-1
Scroll up here as it has also been explained on this page.
No. In this sentence 고양이 has a 는 ending, indicating topic case, while 음식 gets an 이 ending indicating nominative case. -를 and -을 indicate accusative case. The verb in this case is 있다, meaning to be.
Usually, subject case indicates the actor of a sentence while the accusative is the target of the action. But the verb be and 있다 are used to state that two things are the same. With this verb, there is no target of the action, so this never has an accusative (no 를 or 을). Most languages with grammatical case would have both the cat and the food as nominative case. In Korean, the first is topic case, and the second is nominative.
