"늑대하고 곰은 무서워요."

Translation: Wolves and bears are scary.

[KrysTal415]

Humans are more scarier

[Snoopy2075]

"more scarier"?

[annieostara]

The wolf and bear are scary?

[dasanders]

what would "the wolf and the bear are scared" be translated to?

[KR2019]

I assume it would be 늑대하고 곰은 무서워해요.

[pipi310847]

Yea, your right

[RyllyPrncss]

I had the same question.

[cornyholio]

Anyone else typed "Wolfs"? >

[s.kwon]

Idiot me wrote 'wolfs and beers' u.u

[MeiMei557691]

A previous question was marked wrong for saying "monsters" instead of 'monster" (as the was no 들)...but now this q marks wrong for no plural with no 들! Would be nice if consistent. Especially as plurals are not specified in korean as often as in english.

[Ash-Fred]

I added missing translations but no exercise without 들 accepts only plural answers. It is just one of the possible translations were shown to you.

[Pamela909830]

I put, "The wolf and the bear are scary" -- because there was no 들. It was marked wrong. I reported that my answer should be accepted. Nov. 2, 2019.

[vantae01]

what's the difference between 무서워요 and 무서워해요?

[Pamela909830]

무서워요 is "scary," and 무서워해요 is "scared."

[Adrian-Michael]

First it's museowohaeyo, then it's museowoyo, what is the infinitive of the verb "to be scary"? Museo-uda? Museopda? Museowohada?

[nogi132]

무섭다 for "to be scary" and
무서워하다 for "to be scared"

[reni705527]

we can use 무서워해요 and 무서워요 in the same context right? like they have no difference

[Pamela909830]

No. They are different. See my comment right above your question. I answered the same question from someone else 3 months ago.
무서워해요 means scared, and 무서워요 means scary.

[Snoopy2075]

Can't it be "the wolves and bears are terrifying"?

[AleJackson-2605]

I used 무서워해요 and it was marked as correct. So I'm a little confused about the difference with 무서워요. I think it IS possible to use them one or the other with the same meaning but... Not always?? When is it possible and when it's not??