1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: Korean
  4. >
  5. "춤을 추는 강아지는 어디에 있습니까?"

"춤을 추는 강아지는 어디에 있습니까?"

Translation:Where is the dancing puppy?

September 20, 2017



I ask this question daily


Probably at auditions to become a 개 pop idol


You mean 'pup' idol...


or big 개 he can dance with txt "I'm not your cat I'm your dog ㄱㄱㄱㄱ




He ran away. He will not be forced to perform dances. He wishes to have his own life. He wishes to paint, in stead. He goes by "Hector" now.


These sentences are too 귀요 for me to handle


한국에서, 제이홉이에요, 맞지?~요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ


A dog dancing must be smart


I'm getting so confused whether its supsosed to be where is the dancing puppy? and where is the puppy dancing? Is there a way to maybe understand the sentence structuring a bit better in this instance or is this a memory thing?


I could be wrong, but I think if you wanted to ask where the puppy is dancing it would be "강아지는 어디에서 춤을 춰요?"

Getting into the grammar, dancing is an adjective here. "The dancing puppy" - dancing is modifying puppy. This is more clear in Korean (to me) because it uses the 는 adjective modifying particle after the verb "to dance" (춤을 추다) creating 춤을 추는.

The verb or the sentence is 있다 which is to be or to exist. We know this because it's conjugated as a verb and, in Korean particularly, because it's at the end of the clause.

The final thing we can look at is the location particle being used. In this sentence 에 is being used. This can mean to a place or it can reference something which exists in/at a location. It does not, however, mean the location at which an action is taking place. For that we use 에서. So the sentence is asking "where does something exist" not "where is an action taking place". That's how you know.

In the other sentence ("강아지는 어디에서 춤을 춰요?") we see a literal translation of "The-dog where-at dancing?" vs "Dancing dog where is?" The literal stuff is a little silly and you shouldn't think of Korean as English, but I thought it might help you see where the focus of the sentence is in Korean. Below are some links that might help clear up confusion about the grammar.

The adjective form Part 1: http://talktomeinkorean.com/lessons/level-3-lesson-13 Part 2: http://talktomeinkorean.com/lessons/level-3-lesson-14

Location particles: http://talktomeinkorean.com/lessons/l1l18/

  • 3125

Small correction, it's 춰요, not 추요. But it's a great explanation nonetheless.


Good catch - edited.


Can it be 'Where is the puppy who dances?'?


The adjective/desriptive word are before puppy, "dancing puppy".


I wish the example sentences were actually useful.


So, how would you say, where is the puppy dancing? the focus on the place and not on the dancing puppy?


On the dancing floor , duh


"where is the dancing dog" is not correct?


Is it ok that i put 어디에 춤을 추는 강아지는 있습니까? It said it was correct but are both ok ?


저는 "개"라는 단어가 욕 몇 마디에 포함된 단어이기 때문에 한국 사람들 "개"보다 "강아지"라고 자주 한다고 들었는데, 제가 "강아지"를 "dog"으로 번역하면 왜 틀리졌어요?


Can this be said as "어디에 춤을 추는 강아지는 있습니까?" Is this also correct?


I put dog instead of puppy because my Korean friend said 강아지 is used for dog and puppy. Why is it not accepted?


Does it always have to be 춤을 추는? Or we can only use either of the two? Like 춤을 개 or 추는 개?


Where is Chimmy?


I noticed that when using 춤다 as an adjective like in 춤을 추는 강아지, it is the only verb (that I've seen so far) that is there twice before the noun (춤을 추는). Is there a reason for this, or is it just one of those things that you have to notice and pay attention to and memorize?

Learn Korean in just 5 minutes a day. For free.