"This here is a hotel."

Translation: 여기는 호텔입니다.

[Swauger]

Sure is pardner.

[angelika1102]

Usually, we say "this is a hotel", don't you?

[Ken479073]

Its just that the "HERE" was imphasize so that you would pick 여기 . If its just "This is a Hotel " It would be 이것은 홑엘입니다

[Pamela909830]

Thanks. This is a good explanation.

[HiMeCriss]

Couldn't it just be here's a hotel?

[loeyloeyloey]

exactly

[silviyabaramova]

Thanks!

[BugTheDestroyer]

Unless someone with an uppity northern accent and condescending attitude asks.

[bunnyhuffy]

whoever's writing korean duolingo is CLEARLY a southerner

[Biklar]

Very silly. It should simply be "this is a hotel" or "here is a hotel".

[3Dollars]

what about 이것이 여기에 호텔입니다?

[Druckles]

Something wrong with the subject particle? I.e.

여기가 호텔입니다

[f_rrest]

A Texan learning Korean.

[suji.inn]

I think it'd be better if 'Here is a hotel'

[terediana]

I don't understand, why is this sentence like this?

[Pamela909830]

See the post by Ken above. It makes sense.

[ONE_ysohn]

Duolingo a southerner

[PandaBambo]

I think it would've been better described as "here is the hotel". The "this" makes it sound like the phrase would go like 이것은 홑엘임니다

[Ingrid999653]

I typed 이 여기는 호텔입니다. Why is this wrong

[Alatriste_11]

Why isn't it possible 여기는 호텔있어요?