"She assumed that he was with a different woman."

Translation: Ea a presupus că el este cu altă femeie.

[StaceyBlas]

El este cu alta? Shouldn't it be a fost?

[D3XT3RY0NuT]

Both "a fost" and "era" should work in this context. Please report it!

[GrossiBP]

So I guess it's a bug to report then

[CarloPost]

este should be a fost. Present vs Past

[David-Herron]

I don't understand "este" here unless as others here noted that Duolingo got this wrong

[Gheorghe496236]

Was = A fost / Era

[Coriander18]

I see again "that he was" is translated in Romanian as "that he is" ie present tense. Naturally I got it wrong, as I tried a fost.

[CarloGamag1]

I reported my previous answers with era or a fost. To be able to finish the lesson!
Between poor enunciation and grammatical errors like this, Romanian is the worst of all the courses I'm taking but I keep going with it because I'm studying it to communicate with my Romanian friend!

[Mapka15]

"Another woman" is better than "a different woman". Which is in Romanian also not meaning the same...

[DornenEngel]

yeah, a fost does not work

[Gabriel750645]

CăA FOST

[Jill635577]

As with others, I don't understand why "Ea a presupus ca el a fost cu alta femeie" was not accepted. I don't understand the "este" here. Reporting.

[Andrei926539]

Romanian does not have sequence of tenses rules. You could also say "Eu am presupus ca el va fi cu altă femeie" and still be fine.

[fb...dan_dan]

A presupus corect

[olb38]

I supose that (in romanian) is normal to say ..a presupus ca este... . It is possible in my native language - bulgarian to have combinet past and present time at the same sentence

[CarloGamag1]

Isn't he was el/ela era for indicatve imperfect or a fost for indicative compound?

[LidiaLita]

He was or he is still with her? In Romanian version