The translation "Matěj is looking at those foods" should use "food" not "foods".
I also reported this, but the idea of jídlo can also be a dish or a meal. Since it is plural here, I suppose food is less precise than meals or dishes, and I personally take issue with "food" being listed in the hint but then rejected and replaced with "foods" in the answer.
This is not correct. It is foods as multiple types of food, meals - https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/58324/food-vs-foods-spelling-and-meaning
I see no point in this discussion where a compelling argument is made that "ta jidla" is not adequately translated by the uncountable plural "food". No one has convinced me that as a translation °choice° it is incorrect. It may not get at the subtleties of the plural construction in Czech as clearly, but it is by no means an incorrect translation.
I agree 100%. I get what they were trying to do, but that is not the first place an American-speaking mind would go with the sentence. "Food" should be an acceptable translation. I don't know why the recalcitrance is necessary. Just allow "food" to be an acceptable choice for the translator and move on.
"Jidlo" is singular neuter, which becomes "jidla" when plural. "Foods" is generally a weird construction in English, though.
Food is most often an uncountable noun in English and as so it would be very uncommon to use the countable version and say "foods". The context for the sample sentence means it would never be "foods".
It uses thise sense of foods https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/58324/food-vs-foods-spelling-and-meaning
Meals is a very unnatural translation. It would be better to just alter the answer so that it accepts the English "food" which is an uncountable noun.
Then the English translation needs to be different. I don't think foods as a type is what is meant here, is it?
"Meals" is a totally different thing from "foods". Foods as a countable noun is not really used in English except for in incredibly specific circumstances. Is that true of jidla?
How exactly? It uses thise sense of the word https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/58324/food-vs-foods-spelling-and-meaning
A meal, is a single dish. Foods are types. I eat a meal for dinner. I don't eat foods for dinner. The typical construction outside of very formal writing would be "Italy has many different kinds(types) of food."
Foods is a very formal construction better suited for scientific journals and political reports than colloquial speech or regular writing. Is that also true of jidla?
No, jídla is common. That's why the main traslation is meals. Foods is a marginal translation. Many people try to answer with "food" and the system suggests them "foods" but that does NOT mean it is our preferred translation. Not at all!!! We just allow it.
Food is an indivisible noun in several English dialects. "There is so much food on the table." "There are so many different kinds of food on the table." If you are indicating portions, then the American tradition is to indicate the portion.
On the Czech side, they do kind of run over the curbs often. That jidla can indicate multiple portions or even a selection of food.
There is a difference in UK English dialects, they can "have a coffee." , in North American dialects, you can "have a cup of coffee."
So depending on your audience, you have to properly express the sentence using their norms. As a native American English speaker, food is an indivisible noun. You can have portions of food, but not multiple foods. Foodstuffs yes, but food is like a pair of pants. There is no common usage for a pant. (Which is referring to fast animal breathing. Dogs pant to cool themselves.)
I am not actually sure what is the point you mean to convey. Do you want us to do something or something else?
Should "watches over" not be an acceptable translation of "se dívá na" as in "Matej watches over those meals"
to watch over means to guard, or to protect. Dívat se does not have this meaning (hlídat, střežit, chránit, bránit).
Please read the earlier comments. Jídla is used here with the meaning of "meals" rather than "food."