"I believe that student."
Translation:나는 그 학생을 믿습니다.
22 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
Aren't "나는" and "믿습니다" contradicting each other? Their politeness levels don't match.
2127
나는 = elevating oneself 저는 = lowering oneself
습니다 = elevating the listener
You can elevate both yourself and the listener and it's okay, but lowering yourself without elevating the listener is strange.
- 340
Agreed. It sounds strange to me to use "나" with "입니다" form. With "요" and 반말 it works.
It could sound rude to strangers because it can imply that the speaker has a higher position. We should not use 나 when we use 하십시오체.
https://www.korean.go.kr/front/onlineQna/onlineQnaView.do?mn_id=216&qna_seq=74176
https://www.korean.go.kr/front/onlineQna/onlineQnaView.do?mn_id=216&qna_seq=20730
it can imply that the speaker has a higher position
This is already well explained in the Tips and Notes section. I am aware the NIKL suggests us not to use 나 with 합쇼체, but this is just a suggestion for the sake of mutual respect and has nothing to do with grammar or our linguistic habits; the Standard Korean Language Dictionary itself has example sentences where 나 is used along with 합쇼체 or 해요체. Most of all, what do you think about this song?
"나는 행복합니다" is just a line of the lyrics that do not have to do with our "usual" use of Korean. (The lyrics of a lot of songs have errors that we usually do not point out and consider as "poetic license.") // Though the dictionary has such examples, you should think about what style "learners" need to learn first. In most formal situations, you cannot introduce or talk about yourself with 나. Do you think non-natives can figure out that odd use properly? I could not find such use in a lot of textbooks and lecture materials. Even so, sentences like this translation are used, which I won't deny. Nonetheless, at least Duolingo could add a noticeable warning to controversial translations. Now, I won't add anything further, since you won't change your mind.
It doesn't rhyme or anything so I don't see how it could be a "poetic license". Also I was just pointing out that it sounds perfectly natural to native ears. Learners most likely wouldn't have chances to mix 나 with 합쇼체/해요체 themselves, but we do frequently hear such use from rather older people. We usually learn a language for mutual communication, not unilateral delivery of information.
Do you think non-natives can figure out that odd use properly?
I wouldn't call it "odd", but as I said we did explain how it works in Tips and Notes, which you may call a warning.
-으라 is an imperative ending that is used in 하라체, which this course does not cover.
나 = the subject and the topic (here they used the topic marker) 그 = "that", modifying 학생 학생 = the object of the statement (the thing being believed), so it is marked with the object particle
It does not sound strange, it is very common to mix politeness levels in spoken Korean
Why is 믿습니다 pronounced miss'mnida, and not midss'mnida?, i e, the batchim of 믿 sort of disappears
Why is it 을 and not 은? Aren't we saying that in comparison to other students, we believe that one specifically?