"Let's meet tomorrow!"

Translation: 내일 만나요!

[PIEROS16]

why is 만나요 let's meet? i thought it should be 만납시다

[Dovahfluun]

ㅂ시다 is formal-polite, 요 is informal-polite

[PIEROS16]

that's what i thought, thank you. I asked because 만납시다 was marked incorrect (i will flag next time)

[Ash-Fred]

-ㅂ시다 is formal polite, but there are two formal polite levels and this is the lower one, 하오체. You don't want to say it to your elders. There is a propositive ending in 합쇼체, but it is very rarely used and doesn't even sound very polite, so we decided not to include it in the course. You normally just ask a question instead to your elders, like "Would you do ddd?"

[wLKw10]

I am Korean. 만납시다 is correct as well

[Ezxxa..]

ㅂ시다 is the formal form of let's
아/어/여요 is the plane and polite but not so formal
And ~자 is the informal form of it

[funky_bibimbap]

Would it also be correct to use 만나자?

[WildWildBasch]

I guess so but I would like an explanation on this.

[MadsNrgaar1]

Why isn't it "내일 만날 거예요"?

[Adrienne_F]

"내일 만날 거예요" is in the future tense, and means "will meet tomorrow." 내일 만나요 is propositive, so it implies the proposition "let's!"

[Ethan307991]

Where is it implied that there is a second party involved?

[josueetcom]

Due to the fact that "I (present tense) meet tomorrow" doesn't make sense.