1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: Korean
  4. >
  5. "책은 물건입니다."

"책은 물건입니다."

Translation:Books are things.

September 29, 2017



Doesn't this mean "a book is a thing?" Don't we have to say "책들"?


Korean does not grammatically distinguish between singular and plural nouns, it is usually based on the context. note that 들 is rarely used with nouns denoting inanimate objects. It is more often used with nouns denoting animate objects (people and animals), but then only when it is semantically necessary to make a distinction between singular and plural, or to emphasize plurality.


Like 们 after 你 or 我 in Chinese?


책들 (Chaegdeul) means "books", because the "들" (deul) transforms the word into plural.


Topic markers 은/는 can be used to mark generic expressions i.e words that represent a general class of entities.

So 책은 can be understood as "Speaking of books in general". This is why the plural marker 들 is not needed in this case.


This is what I think. Hoping native Korean would explain further.


that is what I think


What is the diffrerence between 은, 이 and 가? They all mean "the", do they? (Sorry my bad english)


Sort of. There is no literal translation for "the" in Korean. 은/는 and 이/가 indicate the subject (in this sentence, the book is the subject).

이/가 can mean "the" (emphasis on the subject) 은/는 can mean "a/an" (emphasis on the verb)

(by the way, your English is fine)


Gahhh I seriously don't get the difference between the subject and topic markers. Like, when are you supposed to use them?


"The" is used for specific objects or places while "a" or "an" is a general one. For example, THE school is a specific school while A school is any school



The subject markers are used to put emphasis on the subject, to say that that's what you are talking about, and that's going to be the topic for the rest of your conversation. You're being 'specific' here. You are highlighting the subject of your conversation.

For topic markers, though, it can mean: -As for me, -As compared to

For example if you're writing that the weather is good, if you add 'neun' after 'nalssi', which is weather (I don't have a Korean keyboard, oops) You are saying that the weather is good today but it wasn't yesterday.

If you add 'ga' after 'nalssi' it shows that you're talking only about the weather.

Go check out Level 1 in Talktomeinkorean.com


I have a little understanding of the difference between 은/는 and 이/가 when I listened to the podcast by "Talk to Me in Korean" and by asking some of my Korean friends. And it is more than looking into The and A.

For my example, I would be relating "dog" with being "cute". Dog ○○ cute.

When 은/는 is used, the noun preceding it is the TOPIC. You are saying that THE DOG is cute NOTWITHSTANDING what other dogs or cats, or anything else are like. You are just talking about the dog! That is the topic. There is however a nuance where a listener could think "So, you're saying the dog is cute, you are implying that nothing else besides it is?" But not necessarily! You just said the dog is cute notwithstanding other things! Most Koreans however, feel that when you use 은/는 you are making this nuance in your sentence.

When 이/가 is used, you are referring to the noun preceding it as the SUBJECT of your sentence. THE DOG is cute. Period. It feels like it answers a silent question of what is cute? THE DOG. The dog is the SUBJECT of my sentence. It receives and answers the silent question of "What is cute?"

So as you can see, it is not a matter of A dog is cute and The dog is cute. In fact I used THE in both scenarios. The difference comes in the nuances that the sentence makes.


I put books are a thing and got it wrong... I am mixing up my english grammar LOL


If you put "books" (you just made it clear that you ment plural) you should have continued "things", I supose...


책은 (chaegeum) 묵건입니다 (mulgeonibnida)


Why L in the second word and not G. (MuL. <----)


물건 - Sino Korean compound word where 물 means object and 건, item/article.

물건 = thing, stuff

Pronunciation: ㄹ+ㄱ -> ㄹ+ㄲ (Tensation)

물건 should sound like 물꺼+ㄴ...


thank you so much


I typed "Book is a thing" Wrong?! Wae?! Theyre not the same?


Maybe because you didn't say "A book" or "The book"?


When do you use 입니다?


You use 입니다 when you are stating what something is. 입니다 basically means 'to be' so like how you'd say 'The girl is Korean' you'd say 여자아이는 한국 입니다.

As you may know, Koreans make their sentences in a Subject - Object - Verb type of way so The girl - Korean - Is = 여자아이는 - 한국 - 입니다

Hope this was helpful.


I guess it would be 여자아이는 한국사람 입니다


Yes. Or,

여자아이는 한국인입니다 The girl is Korean

한국인 = 한국 사람 - Korean person.


이다 - be, be equal to copular verb used to equate two entities.

입니다 is 이다 in the present tense (in its formal and respectful form)

So 책은 물건입니다 ->

책 (books) 물건 (things) 입니다 (=) ->

Books = things ->

Books are things.


책은 물건입니디 책은 물건입니디


Is -은/-는 more often to translate to a thing in general like "books in general." While -을/-를 translates to "the book" or something known to both the speaker and the listener, and does -이/-가 closer to "a book" or "a thing somewhere"?


Same. Thought it was a book is a thing


The notes point out (and several discussions repeat) the fact that either translation could be correct, depending upon the situation. Without more context it is impossible to know whether the author intended it to be singular or plural. Admittedly, it could be clarified with the insertion of 들, but Koreans commonly refer to plurals without use of 들.


I said the book is an object and got it wrong. Perhaps thing and object could both be accepted?


If you filed a report, I am sure it will ultimately be accepted. There are many possible translations, as evidenced by the Naver online dictionary: http://dic.naver.com/ (enter 물건)


  1. 물체) thing, stuff, object
    이 물건은 어디에 쓰는 거죠? What's this thing for?

책상 위의 이 물건들은 다 뭐냐? What's all this stuff on the desk?

사용하신 물건은 꼭 제자리에 갖다 두세요 (Please) Put things back where they belong[in place] after you use them.

2 (상품) product, item, article, commodity; (집합적) goods, stock

새로운 물건을 들여놓다 have new products.

물건 값을 치르다 pay (for)

실수로 다른 물건을 보냈다 I sent the wrong articles by mistake.

물건이 다 떨어졌습니다 (상점에서) We're out of stock.

세일 기간 중에 산 물건은 교환이 안 된다 Goods bought on sale are not exchangeable.

저희 가게는 각종 물건을 취급하고 있습니다 Our shop deals in various lines of commodities.

주문한 물건은 언제쯤 배달되죠? When will the goods I ordered be delivered?

주문한 물건은 언제쯤 배달되죠? When will I get the items I ordered?

이 제품이 요즘 제일 잘 팔리는 물건이다 This is the best-selling item[product].

저희 물건을 보여 드릴게요 I'll show you our selection. / line / products /goods / stock

특별히 찾으시는 물건이 있으세요? Do you have anything / something particular in mind?

3.(특이하고 대단한 사람)
저 녀석 참 물건이네 He's really something.


Please what is the difference between 은 는 가 이


What exactly does 입니다 mean?


It's the verb 이다 which means "to be" conjugated at the high formal tense. Ex: I am Félix : 저는 Felix입니다


Why Don't match my answer??? Plz help anyone, '' book is a think, books are things, A book is a think, but no accept!!!


. Spelling mistake:

A thing - an inanimate object

A think - a period of reflection

Once you correct this mistake and if DLG still rejects your answer, flag them.

That said, "is a thing" (singular) can be misleading because it also means "is popular/well acclaimed".


how do we differentiate between singular and plural nouns for inanimate object? bcs i said 'a book is a thing' and got it wrong so i'm very confused rn


. Translating KOR->ENG

When you can translate 책 as "all the books", then it is safer to use books; if not, use the singular form book. BUT that does not mean A book is wrong though.

The plural of 책 is 책들. 들 ~ equivalent of the English "s". But it is only used for emphasis or to avoid ambiguity.


책들은 물건입니다.


책은 물건입니다, wouldn't you also say/write it as, 'Books is a thing'? Or my english wrong there?


In English,

Books is a thing = Books (collectively/in a whole) is a known, popular product

This does not appear to be what the Korean sentence tries to convey.


What is the Korean word for "thing"


것(들) = thing(s)

사물 = object(s)

물건 = stuff


물sounds like it is being pronounced like bru instead of mul. I can't tell if that's intentional or if my audio on the PC isn't playing it right. Google translate say mulgeon-ibnida and maybe because the reader has a deeper voice I can hear it better? I'm not sure.. I think there is an audio pop or cut that I'm interpreting as a B sound.


So the thing is that other peoples pronouncements sound fine. Also as someone who suffers from allergies effecting my nasal in general, I guess I will forever misunderstood? Lol


I think it needs the examples need to have an option to go slower.


How to know wheter the things is plural or not i am so confused


In Korean, the topic tags 은/는 is a referential marker. It often carry a "generic" interpretation.

책은 물건입니다

--> Generally speaking, a book is a thing = Speaking of books in general, they are things

-‐> Books are things.


I do it right but is saying is not right? Whyyy


책은 gives the hint. The 은 tells you it is a topic, not a subject. That gives us the context clue that it is in the general sense. So it is referring to books as whole.


What's the difference between item and thing???


Item : an element of a set list of things

Thing : an entity (existence), animate or inanimate, concrete or abstract, which is not human.


what does 입니다 mean ?


Is. Correct me if I'm wrong.


Correct. "Is or are".

Re. Verbs: Koreans focus on tense, mood, level of courtesy, style - not on plurality/singularity.


How can i distinguish singular and plural.....??


In Korean, topic markers can mark a generic expression i.e. they can be used (not always) to mark the plurality of the attached word,

책은 물건이다 = Books are things / Generally speaking, a book is a thing.

You just have to go by context of the sentence.

Plural marker 들 is rarely used with inanimate objects, unless used with a demonstative adjective. e.g.

저 책 = that book (pointed out)

저 책들 = those books (pointed out)


In which cases I need to use 입니다. Or what do they mean?


Can anyone please tell me what does inmida means


입니다 (am/is/are) is the formal, polite form of the verb 이다, to be. It can be used as a linking verb (used for identification) connecting the subject to the noun attached to 이다. e.g.

그는 의사입니다 = He is a doctor => 입니다 (=is) links subject 그 (= he) to 의사 (= doctor)

그녀는 부자입니다 => 입니다 (=is) links subject 그녀 (= she) to 부자 (= rich person)

= She is a rich person i.e. She is rich (by implication)


it's pure philosophy


For anyone having trouble understanding the difference between topic/subject markers (은/는, 이/가), try watching this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2jrWqBDilM

It really helped me.


I type this sentence [books rae things] on Google translate but I got different answer


Can't comment on Google result. What does Google give as answer? But

책은 물건입니다 =>

책은 = Books (generic sense)

물건 = 물-것은 = inanimate material-thing => inanimate objects / things

입니다, polite formal style of 이다 (=to be) in the present tense = am/is/are


아니 애들아 책은 물건이지 그럼 책들은 물건들 입니다 라고 하냐 아님 하나의 책은 하나의 물건입니다라고 하냐 그걸 니네가 잘 파악 해서 해야지


이 and 가 is subject marker

은 and 는 is topic marker


I don't know how to pronounce " are things"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmCiZfHq7xY&;t=25s (pronunciation practice)

This fellow has his own home page https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYh6ilkmW_wXmSgqq-xdqUQ

and numerous Youtube postings. He is a very effective Korean teacher, as well as being entertaining with his art work and humor.


i know this would be irritating, but how i can pronounce this correctly... like if anyone can romanize this ?? thanks in advance


Don't quote me on this, but I'll give it a shot: chekeun mulgonimnida


What I'm wondering is what 입니다 actually means. I know it means 'is' and 'is a' and can also mean (in this situation) 'are'. But how are you able to distinguish whether the person meant to say 'Books are things' or 'A book is a thing', because there is no plural for book and the sentence could make sense in both contexts?


Meaning wise "books are things" and "a book is a thing" are pretty much the same thing don't you think? But if u wanted to talk about a specific book u could say : 그 책 물건입니다. (that book is a thing)


Please help me, I don't understand in the previous questions, 책들 is books. and after getting the next question 책은 are books too. I really can't find the difference (sorry for bad english)


what does wa mean because that was what i could've put


When did we learn 입니다? I havent seen it and its kinda difficult


I’m not sure exactly what lesson it was taught in, but it’s an ending that is used for identification. Whereas 있어요 is used for saying that someone has something or that something exists. 입니다 (to be) and 있어요 (to have/exist) are used in almost every sentence.

“이 책입니다.” (This is a book) “이 사람입니다.” (This is a person)

“책을 있어요” (There is a book) “사람을 있어요” (There is a person)

Hope this helps.


So, the word things means "물간"?


Typing mistake.

물건 [mulgeon], not 물간 [mulgan] = thing(s)

Learn Korean in just 5 minutes a day. For free.