But they're so delicious.
네! 맛있니다.....하지만 너도 맛있어. 너를 먹자?
Heck yeah raw chicken!!!
I don’t know about raw chicken, but 육회 is a thing.
if a vegan photographer shoots an animal... are they still vegan?
Isn't it technically vegetarian?
Both. Vegans avoid dairy while vegetarians don't. And they both don't eat meat.
thanks but no thanks
I need protein sometimes
What is the relationship between 요리하다 and 요리하지? What does 하지 let you do exactly?
I think the -지 ending is a negation. In these sentences it's like a "(let's) not".
That's not quite right. 말다 (conjugated here as 맙시다) is the negation. -지 basically only serves a grammatical function here.
uggh! Say this to that bear who cOOks a raBBit!!!
What is the meaning of 맙시다 ?
Is 동물을 안 요리합시다 also correct?
I think 안 serves exclusively to the present affirmative tense.
Why is it 요리하지 맙시다 and not 요리하지 마깁시오. Is it just another gramaticial ending?
맙시다 is used for negative propositive mood like ' Let's not.......'
Whereas 마십시오 is used for negative imperative mood like order or request
They're better raw.
Would 동물을 안 요리합시다 be correct also?
I subconsciously made a mistake and wrote 음식을 요리하지 맙시다... ㅋㅋㅋ
What does 맙시다 means, it means ' 'leave'right?
ㅌ what is the difference between 갑지다 and
Shouldn't this be 동물은 or 동물들을 to either stress animals or indicate plural?
I thought that it would've been 동물이
why does "동물을 요리하지 마십시오" not work?
Because that's a command, not a suggestion.
Yours is "Don't cook animals".
It's supposed to be "Let's not cook animals".
i wrote 동물을 요리하지 마십시다. and it counted as true. is it really true?
Whats the 맙니다?!
I think 맙 is the negative part (not) and then 시다 is "let's".