"집에 라디오가 없어요."

Translation: There is no radio in the house.

[WILLFRAENI]

I wrote "there isn't a radio in the house". It should have been accepted but was not. Unless I am missing something, grammatically it is correct.

[Hanzo_Ergo]

This is probably a very stupid analysis, but i think in your way of saying it , there's more emphasis on existence vs anti-existence; In Duos way of saying it, the emphasis is on tangibility.

[LilleMy11]

Shouldn't "I don't have a radio at home" be accepted as well?

[Soccermom98]

I think it wasn't accepted because there was no Korean word for "I" included in the sentence.

[OrtwinVanD]

Could you also say : "The house has no radio." ?

[wintertriangles]

In your sentence, "house" is the topic of the sentence, so it would be written as "집은 라도오가 없어요." The meaning doesn't change of course, it's just a grammatical difference.

[FabienP1]

House is not a person so it sounds weird

[dpatkat]

Yes, 없어요 means "is not ( 집에 "in the house").

But we English speakers do say things like:
The house has no radio.
The art has no heart.
That house is loud. (College parties maybe?)
The clouds stole the brightness from my feelings.

[PriyaKrist]

I did it right but you gust sad rongh

[PriyaKrist]

Ooooo

[yoonhee700898]

I turn on the microphone but it doesn't accept any word.I don't want the microphone turn off

[Monzay]

"There is no radio at home" should be accepted

[ph.qmKJjJ]

There is no radio in the house

[ph.N8wU7b]

Hi

[ph.N8wU7b]

Hello

[ph.N8wU7b]

Hello hi

[V_kookie01]

Shouldn't it accept " the radio is not at home ? "