Can someone help me understand why 큰 숲이 물 근처 있어요 isnt correct?
That's right, too.
It is correct
It's probbably considered incorrect because of the lack of the location particle ~에. Though I think it would be a perfectly fine sentence in everyday speech.
"큰 숲이 물 근처에 있어요" is correct.
"큰 숲이 물 가까이에 있어요" is a valid formation?
Yes. The particle 이/가 marks the subject and you can put the subject at the back or front of the sentence. However duolingo doesn't seem to agree. I had native teachers though and they all said it was fine
Why "물 갂아이에 큰 숲이 있습니다" is incorrect? Why should I use "있어요" not "있습니다"
It's wrong because you wrote 《갂아이》instead of《가까이》
물 근처 큰 숲이 있어요
I think it's right as a korean!!!
Is 물 근처에 큰 숲이 있어요 wrong?
Why is '큰 숲이 물 근처에 있어요' wrong?
why is this "물 근처에 큰 숲이 있어요" wrong?
물 가까이에 큰 숲이 있습니다 should be accepted