"공원에 큰 나무는 훨씬 더 많습니다."

Translation: In the park, there are more big trees by far.

[curiousniffler]

This sentence doesn't seem make a lot of sense by itself.

[70Bz5pxA]

This sentence is the most stupid by far.

[pissoffghost]

oh geez the english translation confuses me

[Moeeza12]

There are far more big trees in the park" makes more sense

[kochida]

Is it just me or was this a terrible translation

[Murakel]

The "correct" translation is, semantically speaking, word-for-word most correct. However, a more practical translation, like you might see in Netflix subtitles, would be something like "There are way more big trees in the park."

[nicoleelocin]

Can someone explain what the translation means please? Is this a comparison?

[FurstWasser]

Either this is sentence is a proverb or the person talking is saying that the park has more trees than the other parks that he has visited; so, correct, the latter is basically a comparison.

[dpatkat]

It is a comparison to trees in this park with more trees that are bigger than trees in other parks or other places.

[peter720000]

The translation should be changed so that it makes sense in English.

[harveyli94]

They took the answer, "there are by far more big trees at the park". Feels like this made more sense.

[Kiyomice]

I hope they remove this sentence, or change it a bit to something that makes a bit more sense.

[ThomasPrik]

can someone explaye why "at the park" is not excepted, when its in the hints?

[erik_sand]

This course really seems to be lacking when in comes to including acceptable translations.

[EthanWatts9]

Duo doesn't understand that in English, "at" and "in" can be used interchangeably, for example, in the park vs at the park.

[neocevar27]

What is this English translation?

[lemonadx7]

I think "There are many more big trees in the park by far" could be pretty good English.

[WesSudduth1]

Yes it is a comparison to an object that is not mentioned therefore 보다 is not included.

[RyanConnel11]

Is this saying the trees are more big or that there are more of them?

[mofalt]

Ooops, I opted for "tall tree" and got an "incorrect". Doesn't that work as well?

[English_peasant3]

❤❤❤❤ you duolingo

[seouldasein]

Why isn't trees plural in Korean if it is in English? Trees is not 나무들 here. Is this right?

[aka_rabbi]

this is the worst sentence I've come upon until now

[serafim176]

this sentence really doesn't seem to make sense in English

[rzerowan]

'there are far more big trees at parks' wasn't accepted

[Yajaira432008]

Me: https://tenor.com/ZJfe.gif

[AspryWrites]

Terrible sentence.

[ckutlu]

Far they questions better on duolingo there are.

[MaitriCheb]

The English translation of this sentence is weird. Please change it

[Yixin127]

Grammar is out the window....

[SadiaAsmat]

This is the most confusing sentence to me by far.

[tabi185471]

so, is it the number or the size of the trees that is bigger?

[Zoogle22]

I put 'The park has far more big trees' and I got it wrong?